[cisco-voip] IOS / CM

[Matthew Linsemier]

I¹m curious about this document as it only lists the IOS version required
for CME / SRST.  We still are UCM 7.1(5a) with IOS 12.4(24)T3 and aren¹t
having any issues.  However, we haven¹t done a whole lot of SRST testing...
Maybe I should do more.

Matt


On 7/19/10 1:17 PM, "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:

> So we are moving from CM 4.2 to 7.1.5.
> 
> according to 
> this: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified
> /communications/system/versions/IPTMtrix.html#wp1016708 we need all our Router
> up to 15.0.1M for CM 7.1.3
> 
> my questions:
> 
> 1.  What about 7.1.5?
> 2.  Why do you need to upgrade to a 15.0 IOS?  Could 12.4T work?
> 3.  If we upgrade IOS to 15.0 will the Routers (VGWs) still work on CM 4.2?
> 
> If you have any info on the relationship between IOS and CM I would like to
> understand it more completely.  I have both H323 and MGCP VGW's.  Since some
> of them are H323 does the IOS requirements go out the window?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may
be protected by one or more legal privileges. It is intended
solely for the use of the addressee identified above. If you
are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying
or distribution of this communication is UNAUTHORIZED. Neither
this information block, the typed name of the sender, nor
anything else in this message is intended to constitute an
electronic signature unless a specific statement to the
contrary is included in this message. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately contact me and delete
this communication from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100719/36ae5935/attachment.html>