[cisco-voip] CM x.0 vs x.1
paul dial
dialp at ucar.edu
Mon Jun 21 11:49:19 EDT 2010
Thanks for the feedback.
paul
On 6/14/2010 9:10 AM, Wes Sisk wrote:
> IMHO
>
> There have been attempts to improve .0 releases. However, they are
> moderately successful at best. I offer the numerous respins of 8.0 as
> example of continued .0 issues.
>
> /Wes
>
> On Friday, June 11, 2010 4:02:01 PM, Chris Ward (chrward)
> <chrward at cisco.com> wrote:
>> The reasons you mentioned about .0 releases were actually a driving
>> factor to improve the 7 and 8 .0 releases. Now, whether the public's
>> experience has changed or not is something else. But they were released
>> with far fewer defects than previous .0 releases.
>>
>> +Chris
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of paul dial
>> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 3:58 PM
>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: [cisco-voip] CM x.0 vs x.1
>>
>> When upgrading CM, we've typically waited for the x.1 release unless
>> there was a "gotta have it" feature/fix in x.0. This was mostly to
>> avoid the bugs in x.0. Our SE recently said that the 7.0 and 8.0
>> release have had fewer bugs than previous x.1 releases. Just curious if
>> others are more comfortable deploying x.0 now that the code is more
>> mature?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> paul
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list