[cisco-voip] Local Route Groups with Separate Longdistance and Local Circuits

[Joel Perez]

Hey Mike,

Good question. I have been using Local Route Groups for a while now but in
most of my cases I have only needed to use one GW with either one circuit or
various circuits on the same GW. I have also added more than one GW to a
Route Group as failover.
What I did on the GW's with more than one circuit for LD/Local is to prefix
the outbound call.. Once it hits the GW then I send it out the correct
circuit using that prefix. But if you have multiple GW's each carrying one
type of Circuit then I think youre right and you cant use it that way. I
havent ran across that yet so im only speculating.

Hope that helps,

Joel P.

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Mike Lydick <mike.lydick at gmail.com> wrote:

> Is possible to consolidate both local and longdistance route patterns by
> using Local Route Groups, with separate LD and Local circuits? Seems that
> the Local Route Group is only effective with single route group.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Mike Lydick
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100311/c265de05/attachment.html>