[cisco-voip] Local Route Groups with Separate Longdistance and Local Circuits

Mike Lydick mike.lydick at gmail.com
Thu Mar 11 08:46:28 EST 2010


I have a single GW at each site but I am using MGCP. So you used H323 and
let dial-peers take care of the routing, this allowed you to consolidate
Longdistance and International at the callmanager dialplan?

Thanks,


Best Regards,

Mike Lydick




On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Joel Perez <tman701 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Mike,
>
> Good question. I have been using Local Route Groups for a while now but in
> most of my cases I have only needed to use one GW with either one circuit or
> various circuits on the same GW. I have also added more than one GW to a
> Route Group as failover.
> What I did on the GW's with more than one circuit for LD/Local is to prefix
> the outbound call.. Once it hits the GW then I send it out the correct
> circuit using that prefix. But if you have multiple GW's each carrying one
> type of Circuit then I think youre right and you cant use it that way. I
> havent ran across that yet so im only speculating.
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> Joel P.
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Mike Lydick <mike.lydick at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Is possible to consolidate both local and longdistance route patterns by
>> using Local Route Groups, with separate LD and Local circuits? Seems that
>> the Local Route Group is only effective with single route group.
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Mike Lydick
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100311/827969e2/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list