[cisco-voip] Local Route Groups with Separate Longdistance andLocal Circuits

[Beck, Christopher]

Mike:

This is exactly what I did.   I used H323 and dial-peers.  I designated a prefix digit for each unique type of call, so it hits the correct dial-peer.  I use the called  party transformation patterns to perform the prefixing.

Works like a champ.   Multiple gateways in the route group aren't an issue either, as long as they have the same dial-peer configuration.

-Chris

Chris Beck
IT Lead - Voice
USG Corporation
+1 312 436 4541 (work)
+1 312 670 4541 (fax)
+1 312 730 5524 (mobile)
cbeck at usg.com

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mike Lydick
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 7:46 AM
To: Joel Perez
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Local Route Groups with Separate Longdistance andLocal Circuits

I have a single GW at each site but I am using MGCP. So you used H323 and let dial-peers take care of the routing, this allowed you to consolidate Longdistance and International at the callmanager dialplan?

Thanks,


Best Regards,

Mike Lydick



On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Joel Perez <tman701 at gmail.com<mailto:tman701 at gmail.com>> wrote:
Hey Mike,

Good question. I have been using Local Route Groups for a while now but in most of my cases I have only needed to use one GW with either one circuit or various circuits on the same GW. I have also added more than one GW to a Route Group as failover.
What I did on the GW's with more than one circuit for LD/Local is to prefix the outbound call.. Once it hits the GW then I send it out the correct circuit using that prefix. But if you have multiple GW's each carrying one type of Circuit then I think youre right and you cant use it that way. I havent ran across that yet so im only speculating.

Hope that helps,

Joel P.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Mike Lydick <mike.lydick at gmail.com<mailto:mike.lydick at gmail.com>> wrote:
Is possible to consolidate both local and longdistance route patterns by using Local Route Groups, with separate LD and Local circuits? Seems that the Local Route Group is only effective with single route group.


Best Regards,

Mike Lydick


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip




Confidentiality Notice: This email is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, review, dissemination, copying or action taken based on this message or its attachments, if any, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy or delete all copies of the original message and any attachments. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100311/3a82066c/attachment.html>