[cisco-voip] Local Route Group with redundancy
Phil G
pgciscovoip at gmx.net
Mon May 3 05:07:43 EDT 2010
What about putting the 2 E1's in the same route group (which is the LRG)?
Ahmed Elnagar wrote:
>
>
> No, the idea is that you make a generic Route list that point to a
> “system” generated route group then you point your RP to that RL and by
> doing so the CUCM take the local route group that is configured in the
> Device pool of the calling party. Actually I am not talking about
> redundancy in the manner if site A GW is down use site B…no…I am talking
> about two site A GWs that has redundant E1’s and they should be working
> together and in case one fail the other should be handling the calls
> normally…I couldn’t achieve this using Local route group.
>
>
>
> Best Regards;
>
> Ahmed Elnagar
>
> Senior Network PS Engineer
>
> Mob: +2019-0016211
>
> ccie_voice_large.gifccvp_voice_large.gif
>
>
>
> *From:* Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca]
> *Sent:* Sunday, May 02, 2010 3:26 PM
> *To:* Ahmed Elnagar
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Local Route Group with redundancy
>
>
>
> I have not read the full thread, but from what I understand, the local
> route group is for routing calls that only should be routed to the local
> gateways and nothing else.
>
> Calls like 911 should only go out the local gateway. If a 911 call gets
> routed out a remote gateway, chances are they will not know where to
> send the service.
>
> But it does seem a bit strange that redundancy is not available.
>
> Are you sure you can't add the local route group to a route list?
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ahmed Elnagar" <ahmed_elnagar at rayacorp.com>
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Sunday, May 2, 2010 5:27:17 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Local Route Group with redundancy
>
>
> Dear all;
>
>
>
> Anyone know any info if Cisco is going to solve the below problem…or
> maybe any workaround?
>
>
>
> https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/1169001#1169001
>
>
>
> Best Regards;
>
> Ahmed Elnagar
>
> Senior Network PS Engineer
>
>
>
> raya_corp_logoIT Line of Business
>
> RAYA Building El Motamiez District, 6th of October, Egypt
>
>
>
> Mob: +2019-0016211
>
> Phone: +202 3827 6000 Ext.2475
>
> Website: www.rayacorp.com <http://www.rayacorp.com/>
>
> E-mail: ahmed_elnagar at rayacorp.com <mailto:ahmed_elnagar at rayacorp.com>
>
> ccie_voice_large.gifccvp_voice_large.gif
>
>
>
>
>
> Disclaimer: NOTICE The information contained in this message is
> confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have
> received this message in error or there are any problems please notify
> the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or
> alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Raya will not be
> liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising
> from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a
> result of any malicious code or virus being passed on. Views expressed
> in this communication are not necessarily those of Raya.If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
> email, facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy the original
> message.
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> Disclaimer: NOTICE The information contained in this message is
> confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have
> received this message in error or there are any problems please notify
> the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or
> alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Raya will not be
> liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising
> from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a
> result of any malicious code or virus being passed on. Views expressed
> in this communication are not necessarily those of Raya.If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
> email, facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy the original
> message.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list