[cisco-voip] Local Route Group with redundancy
Ahmed Elnagar
ahmed_elnagar at rayacorp.com
Mon May 3 05:15:26 EDT 2010
If one of them is down and the algorithm is circular the calls will fail...CallManager doesn't provide RG component to be backup to each other...that is what accomplished in RL.
Best Regards;
Ahmed Elnagar
Senior Network PS Engineer
Mob: +2019-0016211
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil G [mailto:pgciscovoip at gmx.net]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 12:08 PM
To: Ahmed Elnagar
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Local Route Group with redundancy
What about putting the 2 E1's in the same route group (which is the LRG)?
Ahmed Elnagar wrote:
>
>
> No, the idea is that you make a generic Route list that point to a
> “system” generated route group then you point your RP to that RL and by
> doing so the CUCM take the local route group that is configured in the
> Device pool of the calling party. Actually I am not talking about
> redundancy in the manner if site A GW is down use site B…no…I am talking
> about two site A GWs that has redundant E1’s and they should be working
> together and in case one fail the other should be handling the calls
> normally…I couldn’t achieve this using Local route group.
>
>
>
> Best Regards;
>
> Ahmed Elnagar
>
> Senior Network PS Engineer
>
> Mob: +2019-0016211
>
> ccie_voice_large.gifccvp_voice_large.gif
>
>
>
> *From:* Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca]
> *Sent:* Sunday, May 02, 2010 3:26 PM
> *To:* Ahmed Elnagar
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Local Route Group with redundancy
>
>
>
> I have not read the full thread, but from what I understand, the local
> route group is for routing calls that only should be routed to the local
> gateways and nothing else.
>
> Calls like 911 should only go out the local gateway. If a 911 call gets
> routed out a remote gateway, chances are they will not know where to
> send the service.
>
> But it does seem a bit strange that redundancy is not available.
>
> Are you sure you can't add the local route group to a route list?
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ahmed Elnagar" <ahmed_elnagar at rayacorp.com>
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Sunday, May 2, 2010 5:27:17 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Local Route Group with redundancy
>
>
> Dear all;
>
>
>
> Anyone know any info if Cisco is going to solve the below problem…or
> maybe any workaround?
>
>
>
> https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/1169001#1169001
>
>
>
> Best Regards;
>
> Ahmed Elnagar
>
> Senior Network PS Engineer
>
>
>
> raya_corp_logoIT Line of Business
>
> RAYA Building El Motamiez District, 6th of October, Egypt
>
>
>
> Mob: +2019-0016211
>
> Phone: +202 3827 6000 Ext.2475
>
> Website: www.rayacorp.com <http://www.rayacorp.com/>
>
> E-mail: ahmed_elnagar at rayacorp.com <mailto:ahmed_elnagar at rayacorp.com>
>
> ccie_voice_large.gifccvp_voice_large.gif
>
>
>
>
>
> Disclaimer: NOTICE The information contained in this message is
> confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have
> received this message in error or there are any problems please notify
> the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or
> alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Raya will not be
> liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising
> from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a
> result of any malicious code or virus being passed on. Views expressed
> in this communication are not necessarily those of Raya.If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
> email, facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy the original
> message.
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> Disclaimer: NOTICE The information contained in this message is
> confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have
> received this message in error or there are any problems please notify
> the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or
> alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Raya will not be
> liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising
> from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a
> result of any malicious code or virus being passed on. Views expressed
> in this communication are not necessarily those of Raya.If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
> email, facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy the original
> message.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Disclaimer: NOTICE The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Raya will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any malicious code or virus being passed on. Views expressed in this communication are not necessarily those of Raya.If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by email, facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy the original message.
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list