[cisco-voip] Connecting analog fxo to CUCM (what protocol?)
Madziarczyk, Jonathan
JMad at cityofevanston.org
Tue Nov 9 16:15:25 EST 2010
Thanks Ryan,
That answers that, time to brush up on my H323.
From: Ryan Ratliff [mailto:rratliff at cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 2:54 PM
To: Madziarczyk, Jonathan
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Connecting analog fxo to CUCM (what protocol?)
You won't get FXO MGCP caller id on CUCM 6.x.
-Ryan
On Nov 9, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Madziarczyk, Jonathan wrote:
Running CUCM 6.x
2821 with 2 fxo cards
Nothing special, routing calls from my PRI on CUCM to another PBX for
things like TTY and automated dialers (elevators, etc) and voice calls.
I feel as if there is a plethora of different options for connecting the
FXOs to CUCM
H.323
MGCP
Is it still just user preference or are there reasons to go with one or
the other for something like a TTY?
I think I remember hearing caller id now works with MGCP (used to only
be H323)
Suggestions? Ideas?
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101109/3361cc1e/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list