[cisco-voip] Small Office Setup

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

This is good information. Thanks Nick. 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 



From: "Nick Thompson" <Nick.Thompson at gocorptech.com> 
To: "David Zhars" <dzhars at gmail.com>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 2:58:14 PM 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Small Office Setup 




If it was me and SRST/Local 911 was a must, I’d use an 881SRST. Support for a single FXO, 4 FXS, 2 of the 4 switch ports support POE, 3 rd phone can use a power brick, and I’d use a Fiber -> Ethernet transceiver to hand off cat5 to the router. If the site has the potential to grow past 4 phones you could look into the 1861SRST which will give you 4 FXO, 4FXS and 8 POE. 



If SRST/Local 911 is not required you’ve hit the nail on the head with the 3560. 





From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David Zhars 
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 2:22 PM 
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Subject: [cisco-voip] Small Office Setup 



Need to connect another building into my fiber optic net. So fiber is already at this building. We will only have 3 phones there. 
I know there is a small 3560 (I think 8 ports POE) but what could I use for the router? The 2801s are just so big and probably overpowered for this scenario. 

Thanks anyone. 

Dave 
_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101124/16e77cdb/attachment.html>