[cisco-voip] Unified Communications Virtualization Supported Applications
VoIP Guy
ciscovoiper1 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 5 18:13:00 EDT 2010
Let me correct the second part of my email below... :) apologies for the mix
up...
"Also, if you have several CUCM VMs installed on the C-210 M1 RC2, can you
run VLANs off the VNICs so for example, CUCM VM 1 would be in VLAN 10 and
CUCM VM 2 would be in VLAN 20 for argument's sake with a corresponding trunk
port on the connecting switch which will trunk VLAN 10 and VLAN 20?"
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:50 PM, VoIP Guy <ciscovoiper1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi VoIP List,
>
> I have a question regarding something I read in the doc wiki about
> virtualisation of UC.
>
> It says here:
>
>
> http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_Virtualization_Supported_Applications
>
> ... that "UCCX is supported in Reference Configuration 2, but only a single
> VM can be run. Co-residency is not supported at this time" so does that
> mean, on the C-210 M1 reference configuration (RC) 2, that on the whole
> server, I can only run one virtual machine, and that is UCCX, with no other
> applications to be installed? Seems draconian to me but wanted to verify my
> understanding of this in case I missed a crucial cog somewhere is not
> unheard of. :)
>
> Also, if you have several CUCM VMs installed on the C-210 M1 RC2, can you
> run VLANs off the VNICs so for example, CUCM VM 1 would be in VLAN 10 and
> CUCM VM 20 would be in VLAN 2 for argument's sake with a corresponding trunk
> port on the connecting switch which will trunk VLAN 10 and VLAN 20?
>
> Thank you in advance for any insight. :)
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101005/345b1834/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list