[cisco-voip] curious...what can cause a port to be removed from a dial-peer

[Paul Kruger]

Whoops, some weird shortcut keys sent that one pre-maturely....

What I wanted to say is: If you shut your controller and remove the
pri-group timeslots from the controller, it will remove the port from the
dial-peers that were configured for it.

Not sure if that answers your q?

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Paul Kruger <pauld.kruger at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think it's when you shut your controller and remove the pri-grou
>
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>
>> I'm just reviewing an existing router's config and noticed that half my
>> dial-peers are missing an outbound port, namely the second PRI. Now, I could
>> understand myself leaving a configuration like this if it was the first PRI
>> missing from the dial-peers so that way I always had the configuration, but
>> I'd only use the second PRI and leave the first for inbound calls. But to
>> leave the dial-peers only with the first PRI just doesn't make sense.
>>
>> I know that during SRST configurations are changed, and if a write mem is
>> performed you keep those changes.
>>
>> Can anything happen that would take a port out of dial peer configuration
>> like this?
>>
>> ---
>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
>> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
>>                               - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/aeb7a8fc/attachment.html>