[cisco-voip] curious...what can cause a port to be removed from a dial-peer

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

i may have been doing that while i testing trunk groups. 

or i also suspect that we may have RMA'ed one of the T1 cards at some time. i'm guessing that could have done it as well. 

there was an important dial-peer that i would have tested and confirmed working with debugs that didn't have a port assigned to it, which means it was down, which means it would never be hit. 

this makes me believe it was something that happened after the fact, not from me removing ports. 

thanks. 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 



From: "Paul Kruger" <pauld.kruger at gmail.com> 
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 
Cc: "voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2010 3:34:27 PM 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] curious...what can cause a port to be removed from a dial-peer 

Whoops, some weird shortcut keys sent that one pre-maturely.... 


What I wanted to say is: If you shut your controller and remove the pri-group timeslots from the controller, it will remove the port from the dial-peers that were configured for it. 


Not sure if that answers your q? 


On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Paul Kruger < pauld.kruger at gmail.com > wrote: 


I think it's when you shut your controller and remove the pri-grou 





On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi < lelio at uoguelph.ca > wrote: 







I'm just reviewing an existing router's config and noticed that half my dial-peers are missing an outbound port, namely the second PRI. Now, I could understand myself leaving a configuration like this if it was the first PRI missing from the dial-peers so that way I always had the configuration, but I'd only use the second PRI and leave the first for inbound calls. But to leave the dial-peers only with the first PRI just doesn't make sense. 

I know that during SRST configurations are changed, and if a write mem is performed you keep those changes. 

Can anything happen that would take a port out of dial peer configuration like this? 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 



_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101008/f5718bdd/attachment.html>