[cisco-voip] PWR-C45-2800ACV

[george.hendrix at l-3com.com]

I am sure it isn't worth it and I will just get a couple of 1300w p/s (which is enough).  Also, I believe the tech specs on the 2800w p/s also do not share power between PoE and switch power (as is with the 1300w p/s).  My guess is that with the 2800w p/s, one power leg is for switch power and the other power leg is for PoE.

Bill Hendrix  |  Network/VOIP Engineer

Office: 813.281.3109  Mobile: 813.205.0979
george.hendrix at l-3com.com  |  www.L-3com.com/STRATIS
STRATIS Service Desk: 1-800-871-9983  |  Service Desk email: L-3IT.Help at l-3com.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Doug McIntyre [mailto:merlyn at geeks.org] 
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 1:18 PM
To: Hendrix, George (Bill) @ STRATIS
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PWR-C45-2800ACV

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 08:30:57AM -0400, george.hendrix at l-3com.com wrote:
>   I was wondering if any knows if the Cisco PWR-C45-2800ACV power supply
> for the 4500 will work connected to 125v?  I know Cisco documentation
> only states 240v for this power supply.  


Most likely not. There were some versions of the PWR-C45-1400AC that
only worked on 208V power, even though the data sheets stated either
120V or 208V were allowed.  Vendor tested on 208V, we tried on 120V. 
When they were on 120V, they didn't power up. 

I'd guess that the 2800ACV would be simular (although documented to
only work on 208V power).

Anyway, the power plugs that you can get for the 2800ACV would only
support 208V type connections, you'd have to go out of your way to
make a borked cable to even hook it up to 120V. (ie. it would come
with an L6-20 end which is different and incompatible than the L5-20
for the 120V installations).