[cisco-voip] h323 or mgcp with fractional pri

[Dan Letkeman]

Yes, I just changed it over from mgcp to h323.  I like the idea of
having more control over the config.

So I guess I need to create route patterns on the cucm and dial-peers
on the gateway for pstn calls?

Dan.

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
> YES.
> Did that help?
> :-)  For partial PRI there are work arounds.  but you can set it up in H323.
>  So you do have the ability to do it both ways.
> Where the question comes down to, is what features are better supported by
> one or the other.  and with that.... you would need to make that decision
> based on what you need.
> Personally I like H323, but it take more to configure.
> Scott
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Dan Letkeman <danletkeman at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm setting up a new gateway and I'm new to using CUCM.  I'm wondering
>> what is recommended for a gateway protocol when using a fractional
>> pri?  I have read that there are workarounds for using mgcp with a
>> fractional pri, but am I better off going with h323 for other reasons?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dan.
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>