[cisco-voip] h323 or mgcp with fractional pri

[Dan Letkeman]

I'm leaning towards making it simple on the GW and doing the traffic
changes via Route Patterns.  Is there a simple set of dial-peers I can
enter in the GW to do this?

Thanks,
Dan.

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes.
> Now the question becomes..... do you make it simple on the gateway and still
> do all the traffic changes via Route patterns on the CM, or do you match
> everything on the GW (SRST).
> Scott
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Dan Letkeman <danletkeman at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I just changed it over from mgcp to h323.  I like the idea of
>> having more control over the config.
>>
>> So I guess I need to create route patterns on the cucm and dial-peers
>> on the gateway for pstn calls?
>>
>> Dan.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > YES.
>> > Did that help?
>> > :-)  For partial PRI there are work arounds.  but you can set it up in
>> > H323.
>> >  So you do have the ability to do it both ways.
>> > Where the question comes down to, is what features are better supported
>> > by
>> > one or the other.  and with that.... you would need to make that
>> > decision
>> > based on what you need.
>> > Personally I like H323, but it take more to configure.
>> > Scott
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Dan Letkeman <danletkeman at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> I'm setting up a new gateway and I'm new to using CUCM.  I'm wondering
>> >> what is recommended for a gateway protocol when using a fractional
>> >> pri?  I have read that there are workarounds for using mgcp with a
>> >> fractional pri, but am I better off going with h323 for other reasons?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Dan.
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> cisco-voip mailing list
>> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >
>> >
>
>