[cisco-voip] FXO and Caller ID

Jobe Gates jobe at gates-tribe.com
Tue Sep 14 10:26:14 EDT 2010


Didn't 8.x give you that?

Thanks,
Jobe

On Sep 14, 2010, at 8:12 AM, "Ahmed Elnagar" <ahmed_elnagar at rayacorp.com> wrote:

> MGCP with FXO and caller ID works? What CUCM version?
> 
>  
> 
>  Best Regards;
> 
>   Ahmed Elnagar
> 
>   Senior Network PS Engineer
> 
>   Mob: +2019-0016211
> 
>   CCIE#24697 (Voice)
> 
>  <image001.jpg>
> 
>  
> 
> From: John.VanLaecke at ghd.com [mailto:John.VanLaecke at ghd.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 2:47 AM
> To: Ahmed Elnagar
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net; cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net; Joel Perez
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO and Caller ID
> 
>  
> 
> Hello, 
> 
> I normally configure these as MGCP or SCCP to the call manager and caller ID works a treat, 
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> John Van Laecke 
> Network Administrator 
> 
> GHD   Accomplish More Together
> T: 61 7 3316 4456 | M:0427 015 232 | V: 414456 | E: John.vanlaecke at ghd.com
> Level 2, 201 Charlotte Street QLD AUSTRALIA | www.ghd.com.au
> 
> Water | Energy & Resources | Environment | Property & Buildings | Transportation
> 
> Please consider the environment before printing this email 
> 
> 
> From:
> 
> "Ahmed Elnagar" <ahmed_elnagar at rayacorp.com>
> 
> To:
> 
> "Joel Perez" <tman701 at gmail.com>
> 
> Cc:
> 
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> 
> Date:
> 
> 14/09/2010 07:15 AM
> 
> Subject:
> 
> Re: [cisco-voip] FXO and Caller ID
> 
> Sent by:
> 
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Try to use analog phone with Caller ID feature you are sure it is working and check this line…maybe they are sending the caller ID in a format that the router don’t understand and hence you received the “Caller ID receive failed” 
> The call will never make it to CUCM unless caller ID is received and there is a command to enable a ring timer after which the router stops trying to receive the Caller ID and send the call to it destination without a caller ID “I cannot remember the command right now but if you checked help under voice port you will find it”. 
>   
>   
>  Best Regards; 
>   Ahmed Elnagar 
>   Senior Network PS Engineer 
>   Mob: +2019-0016211 
>   CCIE#24697 (Voice) 
>  <image001.jpg> 
>   
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Joel Perez
> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 6:50 PM
> To: Scott Voll
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO and Caller ID 
>   
> Sorry, forgot to add that, yes it's an H323 GW. The GW has been up for a while so im not sure if Caller ID worked correctly or not in the past.
> We were just told about this and the troubleshooting below was the first thing off the top of my head to check.
> 
> Joel P. 
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote: 
> I'm assuming your using H323....? 
>   
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote: 
> If you put an analog phone on one of those lines and call it do you get caller-id? 
>   
> -Ryan 
>   
> On Sep 13, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Joel Perez wrote: 
> 
> Good Monday morning List.
> 
> Im wondering if anyone of you have ran into an issue with caller ID on FXO ports? The carrier is in Canada and they swear they are sending me caller ID on 4 lines I have from them going into 4 FXO ports on a 2811 release 12.4.20T4.
> I have the calls going to CUCM using Connection Plar (DN). If I enable caller id on the ports then inbound calls rna and never get to CUCM.
> I have tried using CPtone CA, US, none. I have also tried using the following under the Voice ports:
> 
> caller-id alerting pre-ring
> caller-id alerting ring (1,2,3,4)
> caller-id enable type 1,2
> 
> If any of those are enabled the calls rna. The only one that seems to work somewhat is 
> caller-id alerting dsp-pre-alloc 
> With that one the call goes thru but im still not getting Caller ID and I get the following in the debug:
> 
> Sep 13 13:13:09.238: htsp_process_event: [0/1/2, FXOGS_ONHOOK, E_DSP_SIG_0000]fxogs_onhook_ringing
> Sep 13 13:13:09.238: htsp_timer_stop
> Sep 13 13:13:09.238: htsp_timer - 125 msec
> Sep 13 13:13:09.366: htsp_process_event: [0/1/2, FXOGS_WAIT_RING_MIN, E_HTSP_EVENT_TIMER]fxogs_wait_ring_min_timer
> Sep 13 13:13:09.366: htsp_timer - 10000 msec
> Sep 13 13:13:11.082: htsp_process_event: [0/1/2, FXOGS_RINGING, E_DSP_SIG_0100]
> Sep 13 13:13:11.082: fxogs_ringing_not:
> Sep 13 13:13:11.082: htsp_timer_stop
> Sep 13 13:13:11.082: htsp_timer_stop2
> Sep 13 13:13:11.082: htsp_timer_stop3 htsp_setup_ind
> Sep 13 13:13:11.082: [0/1/2] get_fxo_caller_id:Caller ID receive failed.  parseCallerIDString:no data.   <------- This tells me they arent sending me Caller ID unless im reading it wrong.
> 
> Any help would be appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joel P 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
>   
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
>   
>  
> 
>   
> Disclaimer: NOTICE The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Raya will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any malicious code or virus being passed on. Views expressed in this communication are not necessarily those of Raya.If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by email, facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy the original message. 
> _____________________ 
> This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MessageLabs._______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 
> 
> _____________________ 
> This email and all attachments are confidential. For further important information about emails sent to or from GHD or if you have received this email in error, please refer to http://www.ghd.com/emaildisclaimer.html .
> _____________________ 
> This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MessageLabs.
> 
>  
> Disclaimer: NOTICE The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Raya will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any malicious code or virus being passed on. Views expressed in this communication are not necessarily those of Raya.If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by email, facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy the original message.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100914/a68abe96/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list