[cisco-voip] Local Route Groups

[Bob Zanett (US)]

Usually for service disrupting - or potentially disrupting - after hours is always best.   In addition, when you modify anything on a device pool, typically requires a reset of the associated devices.

Bob

www.dimensiondata.com

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of James Avalos
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 4:00 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Local Route Groups

... .has anyone done a migration from "Provisioned" Route Groups to Local Route Groups in UCM 7.X ?
If so, what was your experience like?  Did you have to do the entire overhaul in one shot or in a maintenance window to avoid outage?
Or can it simply be done on the fly?  I have TEHO configured between all sites in a cluster and wanted to leverage the Local Route Groups
to simplify this, now that we're on version 7.

Any insight is much appreciated.  Thanks!


-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100930/3727768d/attachment.html>