[cisco-voip] FXS or FXO?

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

If what you're trying to do is this: 

avaya:FXS <-----> FX?:Cisco 

I don't think you can. 

an FXS port is just that, a station port. 

I believe you have to do this: 

avaya:FXO <-----> FXO:Cisco 

There _may_ be FXS/FXO converters out there from the likes of Viking, etc. but I think FXO to FXO is what you want/need. 


--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 


----- Original Message -----
From: "Edward Countryman" <Edward.Countryman at provena.org> 
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 2:55:00 PM 
Subject: [cisco-voip] FXS or FXO? 





Looking for a quick answer on something. 



For a specific scenario, I need to route calls from Cisco to an analog “station port” on one of my Avaya’s. 



Question is; do I need an FXO or an FXS in my router to accomplish this? 


_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110429/f1c8722e/attachment.html>