[cisco-voip] Are "call blast" groups a good idea?

Scott Voll svoll.voip at gmail.com
Tue Aug 16 15:41:31 EDT 2011


What do you want to happen with "Call Blast"?  all 6-7 extensions ring?
 this is called a broadcast hunt group.

Do you want it to auto answer on all extensions?  that would be a shared
line with auto answer.

Off net stuff is going to be more of an issue.  I'm guessing UCCx will have
to be involved.

Scott

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Drew Weaver <drew.weaver at thenap.com>wrote:

> Hi,****
>
> ** **
>
> We have an emergency DID phone number that people can call that kind of
> bypasses all of our auto attendants, etc and goes directly to all of the
> phones in the office.****
>
> ** **
>
> I am trying to replicate this functionality in our Cisco phone system.****
>
> ** **
>
> Is a 'call blast' group the "proper" way to do this?****
>
> ** **
>
> We have about 6-7 extensions internally that we want to hit and then also
> two outside phone numbers.****
>
> ** **
>
> I would appreciate any opinions/advice you have in this regard.****
>
> ** **
>
> thanks,****
>
> -Drew****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110816/fb3c4b85/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list