[cisco-voip] Are "call blast" groups a good idea?

[JASON BURWELL]

Sounds like you need a Broadcast Hunt Group

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> 
To: 'Scott Voll' <svoll.voip at gmail.com> 
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Sent: Wed Aug 17 07:45:25 2011
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Are "call blast" groups a good idea? 



Hi Scott,

 

I basically want it to ring a bunch of extensions and whoever answers first to be given the call.

 

thanks,

-Drew

 

 

From: Scott Voll [mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 3:42 PM
To: Drew Weaver
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Are "call blast" groups a good idea?

 

What do you want to happen with "Call Blast"?  all 6-7 extensions ring?  this is called a broadcast hunt group.

 

Do you want it to auto answer on all extensions?  that would be a shared line with auto answer.

 

Off net stuff is going to be more of an issue.  I'm guessing UCCx will have to be involved.

 

Scott

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Drew Weaver <drew.weaver at thenap.com> wrote:

Hi,

 

We have an emergency DID phone number that people can call that kind of bypasses all of our auto attendants, etc and goes directly to all of the phones in the office.

 

I am trying to replicate this functionality in our Cisco phone system.

 

Is a 'call blast' group the "proper" way to do this?

 

We have about 6-7 extensions internally that we want to hit and then also two outside phone numbers.

 

I would appreciate any opinions/advice you have in this regard.

 

thanks,

-Drew

 


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110817/5154b8e9/attachment.html>