[cisco-voip] Are "call blast" groups a good idea?

[Scott Voll]

Look at a broadcast hunt group.  Outbound calls (off net) will be a
different issue.

Scott

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Drew Weaver <drew.weaver at thenap.com> wrote:

> Hi Scott,****
>
> ** **
>
> I basically want it to ring a bunch of extensions and whoever answers first
> to be given the call.****
>
> ** **
>
> thanks,****
>
> -Drew****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Scott Voll [mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 16, 2011 3:42 PM
> *To:* Drew Weaver
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Are "call blast" groups a good idea?****
>
> ** **
>
> What do you want to happen with "Call Blast"?  all 6-7 extensions ring?
>  this is called a broadcast hunt group.****
>
> ** **
>
> Do you want it to auto answer on all extensions?  that would be a shared
> line with auto answer.****
>
> ** **
>
> Off net stuff is going to be more of an issue.  I'm guessing UCCx will have
> to be involved.****
>
> ** **
>
> Scott****
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Drew Weaver <drew.weaver at thenap.com>
> wrote:****
>
> Hi,****
>
>  ****
>
> We have an emergency DID phone number that people can call that kind of
> bypasses all of our auto attendants, etc and goes directly to all of the
> phones in the office.****
>
>  ****
>
> I am trying to replicate this functionality in our Cisco phone system.****
>
>  ****
>
> Is a 'call blast' group the "proper" way to do this?****
>
>  ****
>
> We have about 6-7 extensions internally that we want to hit and then also
> two outside phone numbers.****
>
>  ****
>
> I would appreciate any opinions/advice you have in this regard.****
>
>  ****
>
> thanks,****
>
> -Drew****
>
>  ****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip****
>
> ** **
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110817/4173fb41/attachment.html>