[cisco-voip] Weird call in VM..... Explain that?
Scott Voll
svoll.voip at gmail.com
Tue Dec 6 13:31:22 EST 2011
2811 H323(15.1T) -- CM 7.1.5 -- (sccp) 7961 -- (non-sip) UC 8.5
Scott
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Chris Ward (chrward) <chrward at cisco.com>wrote:
> I saw a case like this a long time ago when I was in TAC. Basically, a
> customer was reporting that they received VMs of entire conversations, in
> my case it was the conversation of a VP within the company, which was
> less-than-optimal for the customer.****
>
> ** **
>
> It turned out that when certain devices encounter a TCP connection failure
> (unregister) while streaming audio, they would forever stream an additional
> audio stream to that IP and port until the device was cold-rebooted. In
> this case it was a legacy VM device that DPA that wasn’t filtering out
> audio streams that were not from the current audio session and the 7970 the
> defect that when unregistered, would continue to send an additional audio
> stream (CSCsj99361).****
>
> ** **
>
> We were able to finally track down the bug by using CDR records and the
> voicemail to determine who’s phone we were hearing and then looking for
> that phone’s calls before the cross-talk was heard.****
>
> ** **
>
> So, let me ask, what are the details of this deployment? Voicemail system,
> phones in use, integration type, and versions for all.****
>
> ** **
>
> At any rate, this totally changed my perception that cross-talk is not
> possible in an IP environment. J****
>
> ** **
>
> +Chris****
>
> Hosted Collaboration Solution TME****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Scott Voll
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 06, 2011 12:20 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Weird call in VM..... Explain that?****
>
> ** **
>
> We received a VM this morning when checking a branch VM box.****
>
> ** **
>
> Basically the VM sounded like a full conversation between two people
> (possible a bank being one side) and the whole conversation is there
> including MoH that is not ours either. we are on the west coast and the
> call came in from Kansas. we see the call in CDR's on CM.****
>
> ** **
>
> What the hey happened? ideas?****
>
> ** **
>
> Only thing I can guess is that we got conferenced in, incorrectly, or the
> telco has some major issues.****
>
> ** **
>
> TIA****
>
> ** **
>
> Scott****
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20111206/8503ceea/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list