[cisco-voip] IPv6?

[Scott Voll]

SCCP IP Phone support.  Yes
CM. Yes
UC. Yes
UCCx (7.x)..... I don't believe so
Other Apps..... Not sure.  Depends on the App I'm guessing.
MGCP / H323 VGWs..... I'm pretty sure they support IPv6.  Don't know about
vendor SIP trunks.

My secondary question is how would running voice in a dual stack setup
affect voice / Apps?


Scott

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Charl Crofton <charl.ccrofton at gmail.com>wrote:

> This is quite an interesting debate.
>
> Are all phones supporting this yet? What about SIP clients?
> Are TMS systems supporting this, thinking what a CDR will look like now?
> LIke you guys mentioned, SIP Trunks?
> What about dial-peers - can you type "session taget ipv6:" ?
>
> Just a few I can think of now
>
> THnx
> Charl
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Jim,
> >
> > A good point. We don't have any SIP trunks at this time, but I could
> > see where IPv6 would affect that.
> >
> > Could you have IPv4 on the intranet facing interface of your border
> > controller and IPv6 on the public facing interface?
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Jim McBurnett <jim at tgasolutions.com>
> wrote:
> >> Ed,
> >> What about SIP trunking across the Internet?
> >>
> >> Jim
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ed Leatherman
> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 11:37 AM
> >> To: Scott Voll
> >> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IPv6?
> >>
> >> We're starting to think about maybe beginning to plan for looking into
> it.
> >>
> >> In all seriousness, I think what will push us into it will be WiFi
> >> users. Students are bringing in so many wireless devices on campus
> >> each year, and for whatever reason we don't use NAT.
> >>
> >> Upper management has heard the term and even if they don't know what
> >> it all means, they have asked about it. There is another higher edu in
> >> the state that will enable IPV6 on a router somewhere and claim they
> >> are using IPv6 on their network, so then we'll have to "keep up with
> >> the jones's".
> >>
> >> I don't see any need (for us) on the voip side other than
> >> compatibility/interop with whatever the data network group decides to
> >> do.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> Anyone ventured out into IPv6 on there Voice networks?  Data for that
> >>> matter?
> >>> Scott
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cisco-voip mailing list
> >>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ed Leatherman
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ed Leatherman
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110202/4ed63a77/attachment.html>