[cisco-voip] CDR for a Translation pattern
Lelio Fulgenzi
lelio at uoguelph.ca
Thu Feb 17 08:33:20 EST 2011
I agree this is the approach I would take. You do have to take into consideration the affects of forwarding when sending calls to VM.
With this approach TFT called party also knows how to answer the phone because they know where the call is coming from.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 17, 2011, at 8:29 AM, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
> I have not tested this but the concepts are sound.
>
> CTI Route points, ports, etc. can have wildcards such as 1XXX (reference IPMA) They can be configured with CFUnreg or CFAll with a forwarding calling search space. Forwarding actually also supports masks so you can do something like:
> DN: 1XXX
> forward destination: XX
>
> dialing 1234 would match the DN. The XX in the forward destination are treated as a mask to digits 34 become the forward destination. This is mostly trivia. I believe you can achieve what you need with a DN of 18XXXXXXXXX and forward destination of 18XXXXXXXXX but with a different forwarding search space.
>
> If the phone endpoints have CSS that can reach a dummy cti route point configured with 18XXXXXXXXX as first step then it should be recorded in CDR. Then use the forward all or forward unregistered and associated CSS to reach the translation pattern to do the number modification and route the call. In my mental math this may give you what you need in the original and final called party numbers in CDR.
>
> I'd be interested to hear about your results.
>
> Regards,
> Wes
>
> On 2/16/2011 10:38 PM, Jim McBurnett wrote:
>>
>> You hit the proverbial nail…
>> Long term analysis..
>>
>> I have a customer with over 100 toll free numbers gathered over the years.
>> Some get lots of calls and some none.. BUT to see what is happening we need those statistics.
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 8:13 PM
>> To: Jim McBurnett
>> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CDR for a Translation pattern
>>
>> Not sure if this helps or not, but I know there is a system parameter that enables complex digit analysis and will add all translations into the trace files.
>>
>> It will help with troubleshooting, but not sure about any long term analysis.
>>
>> ---
>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
>> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
>> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>>
>>
>> From: "Jim McBurnett" <jim at tgasolutions.com>
>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 8:08:22 PM
>> Subject: [cisco-voip] CDR for a Translation pattern
>>
>>
>> Hey folks,
>> Got a quick one..
>>
>> I know we can’t check CDR for a Translated number..
>> IE 800’s coming into an LD trunk going to a call center queue number… or AA..
>>
>> So besides creating a # for every 800 # and forwarding that on, is there any way to show a translation pattern is actually being used?
>>
>> Ideas??
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jim
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110217/f5cbf67f/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list