[cisco-voip] C200 co-residency

Ed Leatherman ealeatherman at gmail.com
Tue Jul 5 19:34:24 EDT 2011


FWIW, I read it as only those specific scenarios are supported.

On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Paul <asobihoudai at yahoo.com> wrote:
> per
>
> http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_Virtualization_Sizing_Guidelines
>
>
> I see...
>
> Note that the tested reference configuration for UCS C200 M2 is sized for co-residency at a lower capacity per VM than UCS B200 or C210 so only supports a subset of Virtual Machine templates.
>
>
> For UCS C200, you must align with these rules:
>     * The only supported virtual machine OVA templates are:
>     * CUCM - Unified Communications Manager 1000 users
>     * CER - Emergency Responder 12,000 users
>     * CUC or UCxn - Unity Connection 500 users, 1000 users and 5000 users
>     * CUP - Unified Presence 1000 users
>     * CUCCX - Unified Contact Center Express 100 agents
>     * Other unlisted OVA templates are not supported on C200 as they are sized too big.
>     * If C200 is used for Unified Communications Manager Business Edition 6000 then you must follow its co-residency rules.
>     * Otherwise at this time the following co-residency scenarios are supported:
>     * Four VMs: CUCM 1000 users + CUC 1000 users + CUP 1000 users + CUCCX 100 users (the scenario used by Unified Communications Manager Business Edition 6000 )
>     * Up to four VMs: 1 to 4 CUC of various user sizes provided you don't over-subscribe any physical server resources as described previously.
>     * Four VMs: 4 CUP 1000 users
>     * Four VMs: 4 CUCM 1000 users
>     * Three VMs: 3 CUCCX 100 users
>     * Also, any CUCM VM may be substituted with a CER 12,000 user VM in the above scenarios.
>
>
> Which leaves this prescient question:
>
> Are we good to just mix and match any of those OVAs on one C200 so long as we're not oversubscribing resources or is it ONLY the co-residency scenarios listed that are supported? E.g., cucm 1k users + cuc 5k users on one box?
>
> What's the official word? The wording of this documentation is a little bit vague and could use a little clarification. . .
>
> Has anybody else deployed C200s with a mix/match of those OVAs?
>
> Cheers
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>



-- 
Ed Leatherman



More information about the cisco-voip mailing list