[cisco-voip] CUCM CFA to SIP Trunk Fails

Rynard Coetzee Rynard.Coetzee at bytes.co.za
Wed Jun 1 03:05:59 EDT 2011


Hi
Got this issue sorted ,I had to enable the SIP diversion headers on the trunk and also change the calling party selection to First redirecting station ,as my ISP was blocking the calls from the unknown ANI.
Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
Sent: 31 May 2011 06:00 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 91, Issue 31

Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
	cisco-voip at puck.nether.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: UCCX 8.0: Best Practice to update an active script
      (Anthony Kouloglou)
   2.  IPhone with CME (sheref hf)
   3. Re: Video Integrations - CUCM and VCS Control (Dana Tong)
   4. Re: IPhone with CME (Alastair Watts)
   5. Backup issue ver 7.1.3 (James Dust)
   6. CUCM CFA to SIP Trunk Fails (Rynard Coetzee)
   7. Hardware Failure from RTMT -- Director Agent (Scott Voll)
   8. Connecting to third party CUCM via ICT trunk (Damian Turburville)
   9. Re: Connecting to third party CUCM via ICT trunk (Paul)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 20:02:20 +0300
From: Anthony Kouloglou <akoul at dataways.gr>
To: Rasim Duric <rduric at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: "'cisco-voip at puck-nether.net'" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 8.0: Best Practice to update an active
	script
Message-ID: <4DE3CD9C.1030906 at dataways.gr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"

Thanks Rasim,
that is what i was looking for!!
Thanks again.

Anthony

On 30/5/2011 6:35 ??, Rasim Duric wrote:
>
> Look at this discussion:
>
> https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2079251?tstart=0
>
> Rasim Duric
>
> Network Analyst (CCS)
>
> University of Guelph
>
> Guelph, N1G 2W1, ON
>
> 519-824-4120x53146
>
> rduric at uoguelph.ca <mailto:rduric at uoguelph.ca>
>
> *From:*Anthony Kouloglou [mailto:akoul at dataways.gr]
> *Sent:* May-30-11 11:03 AM
> *To:* Rasim Duric
> *Cc:* 'cisco-voip at puck-nether.net'
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 8.0: Best Practice to update an 
> active script
>
> But the initial question is:
> "How can i upload a script with a name that already exists in UCCX 8.0 
> standard"?
> I cannot refresh anything since i can't upload in the first place.
>
> On 30/5/2011 17:55, Rasim Duric wrote:
>
> When we modify a script we don?t restart the crs engine, we?d just 
> refresh the script. Restarting the crs engine affects all other 
> applications.
>
> Rasim Duric
>
> Network Analyst (CCS)
>
> University of Guelph
>
> Guelph, N1G 2W1, ON
>
> 519-824-4120x53146
>
> rduric at uoguelph.ca <mailto:rduric at uoguelph.ca>
>
> *From:*Anthony Kouloglou [mailto:akoul at dataways.gr]
> *Sent:* May-30-11 10:45 AM
> *To:* Rasim Duric
> *Cc:* 'cisco-voip at puck-nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck-nether.net>'
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 8.0: Best Practice to update an 
> active script
>
> Yes, that is how i do it!
> But then, i have to go to the application that used that script and 
> change it there.
> And i have to update all the parameters that are changed!!
> In older CRS versions, it used to automatic stop the crs engine, 
> upload the script and then restart the engine.
> But now it just fails!
>
> On 30/5/2011 17:21, Rasim Duric wrote:
>
> Did you try ?Save As? a different file name and upload?
>
> Rasim Duric
>
> Network Analyst (CCS)
>
> University of Guelph
>
> Guelph, N1G 2W1, ON
>
> 519-824-4120x53146
>
> rduric at uoguelph.ca <mailto:rduric at uoguelph.ca>
>
> *From:*Anthony Kouloglou [mailto:akoul at dataways.gr]
> *Sent:* May-30-11 10:01 AM
> *To:* Rasim Duric
> *Cc:* 'cisco-voip at puck-nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck-nether.net>'
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 8.0: Best Practice to update an 
> active script
>
> Hi Rasim,
> i didn't get it!
> After i validate and save the script from the UCCX editor, i upload it 
> to the script.
> There, i get "script already exists, overwrite existing one?
> i choose yes and i get "Error while uploading the file. Please try again."
>
> On 30/5/2011 16:33, Rasim Duric wrote:
>
> The best way is to follow VSURE, i.e. Validate, Save, Upload, Refresh, 
> Execute.
>
> Rasim Duric
>
> Network Analyst (CCS)
>
> University of Guelph
>
> Guelph, N1G 2W1, ON
>
> 519-824-4120x53146
>
> rduric at uoguelph.ca <mailto:rduric at uoguelph.ca>
>
> *From:*cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> <mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Anthony 
> Kouloglou
> *Sent:* May-30-11 5:18 AM
> *To:* cisco-voip at puck-nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck-nether.net>
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] UCCX 8.0: Best Practice to update an active 
> script
>
> Hi,
> in my UCCX 8.0 (standard) i often want to perform a change on the 
> sctipt of an application.
> But when i try to upload it where the old script is, i choose to 
> replace the old one but then i get a fail message.
>
>
> What is the best way to perform it?
>
>
>
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110530/643559e2/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 17:23:21 +0000
From: sheref hf <sheref_hf at hotmail.com>
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip]  IPhone with CME
Message-ID: <SNT120-W37945A26B45E26A48A8A6A917B0 at phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"


Hi all
 
I want to configure IPhone mobile in CME
 
Can you send me any details or configuration to configure IPhone with CME ...?

Thanks 
 
BR,
 
Sherif
Network Engineer
 
 

 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110530/1e820c12/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 02:42:29 +0000
From: Dana Tong <Dana.Tong at ivision.com.au>
To: "<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net)"
	<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Video Integrations - CUCM and VCS Control
Message-ID:
	<7803240C03BCCE46BD2412FCBC18CF5B1ECC1907 at IVMB1.ivision.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

FYI we hit a bug. No fix as yet.

http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtl08724



From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dana Tong
Sent: Monday, 30 May 2011 4:37 PM
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net)
Subject: [cisco-voip] Video Integrations - CUCM and VCS Control

Hi all,

We have the following setup:

CUCM 8.0(2)
CUPS 8.0(2)
CUPC 8.5(1)
Tandberg VCS Control X5.1
Various Tandberg and Polycom VC units
Codian MSE 8000 - ver 4.1(1.59)

We are receiving the following results:
CUCM - VCS Control (SIP) No video for CUPC to VC Rooms. (I haven't tried via the MCU unfortunately)

CUCM - VCS Control (H323)

Everyone dials the MCU (CUPC, Tandberg, Polycom) = All OK!
CUPC Softphone to MCU - All Ok
CUPC Softphone to Tandberg - All Ok
CUPC Softphone to Polycom - All Ok

CUPC Deskphone Video to MCU - All Ok
CUPC Deskphone Video to Tandberg - One-way Video. Video received at Tandberg. No Video at CUPC, however CUPC has audio.
CUPC Deskphone Video to Polycom - One-way Video. Video received at Tandberg. No Video at CUPC, however CUPC has audio.

Have tried this with three different phones/ models (7965, 7961, 7941) and have had the same results. Firmware on the 7965 is 9.0(2) SCCP.

Would anyone have any suggestions on getting Deskphone video to work directly with the VC rooms? (ie not via the MCU).

Thanks
Dana



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110531/7af0d3fd/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 14:27:26 +0930
From: Alastair Watts <awatts at pett.com.au>
To: sheref hf <sheref_hf at hotmail.com>
Cc: "<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IPhone with CME
Message-ID: <D0FF43EF-03F9-4EF9-B854-030A5A4007CB at pett.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

You need CME 8.6 (IOS version 15.1(4)M) then follow:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/admin/configuration/guide/cmelabel.html#wpxref89588

Cheers,

Al


On 31/05/2011, at 2:53, sheref hf <sheref_hf at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all
>  
> I want to configure IPhone mobile in CME
>  
> Can you send me any details or configuration to configure IPhone with CME ...?
> 
> Thanks
> 
>  
> 
> BR,
> 
>  
> 
> Sherif
> 
> Network Engineer
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110531/e6ff22fe/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 10:07:32 +0000
From: James Dust <james.dust at charles-stanley.co.uk>
To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Backup issue ver 7.1.3
Message-ID:
	<B5861604FFBFF545BA7BDD7763E6C3FC35449A at CSEXMBOX02.charles-stanley.co.uk>
	
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Morning all,

I have a backup problem I haven't seen before, I am backup my cluster up via sftp.

The error I am getting is:

Failed to initiate backup. Unable to acquire a Lock against all components. Could be because the lock is owned by some other Thread or an upgrade is currently in progress.

I am fairly certain a process or service is locked somewhere, and a reboot of the cluster will resolve this problem. However before I do that can anyone shed any light on what might be causing this?

Regards

James

Consider the environment - Think before you print

The contents of this email are confidential to the intended recipient and may not be disclosed. Although it is believed that this email and any attachments are virus free, it is the responsibility of the recipient to confirm this.

You are advised that urgent, time-sensitive communications should not be sent by email. We hereby give you notice that a delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).

Details of Charles Stanley group companies and their regulators (where applicable), can be found at this URL http://www.charles-stanley.co.uk/contact-us/disclosure/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110531/5992cb72/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 12:13:12 +0000
From: Rynard Coetzee <Rynard.Coetzee at bytes.co.za>
To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM CFA to SIP Trunk Fails
Message-ID:
	<97D19F256B859A48A6A93E8A9210E52A1390639F at BYTESEXCH2K10N1.bytes.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi There

I have an issue with forwarding of calls from a DN on CUCM to a PSTN number that is routed across a SIP trunk ,i can call the PSTN number directly but when i forward the DN to the number the call fails when dialled from a different phone. If i dial only the extension of the DN the call proceeds though ,it only happens when dialling the DID number.

Any ideas ?


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110531/2afa15f1/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 06:56:49 -0700
From: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Hardware Failure from RTMT -- Director Agent
Message-ID: <BANLkTiknzYrjfXJVYCf=6=PJ31Nstzfs9Q at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

What is this?  I can't find anything with Google.


At Sat May 28 04:23:55 PDT 2011 on node 10.x.x.199, the following HardwareFailure events generated: hwStringMatch - Director Agent:
LSIESG_AlertIndication 500605B001890650 VD 00/0 is now DEGRADED Sev: 6.


TIA


Scott


PS.  CM 7.1.5 and this is my Sub
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110531/820b6134/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 07:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Damian Turburville <d_turburville at yahoo.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Connecting to third party CUCM via ICT trunk
Message-ID: <50157.74524.qm at web112320.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi,
I am looking for some advice. I have a CUCM 6.1 system at one of my sites and we have a third-party who is on our WAN (but controls their own LAN and servers
etc) who also has a Call Manager (not sure what revision) and they would like to make calls between the two sites. I was thinking it would probably be fairly easy to setup an ICT trunk between the two systems but I am sure our security team would have some issues with that. Is there any way of making the trunk more secure? Locking down ports on the firewall etc, maybe some kind of VPN connection? Is there anyone out there that has done this that could share their experiences?
Many thanks,
Damian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110531/c159661d/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 07:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Paul <asobihoudai at yahoo.com>
To: Damian Turburville <d_turburville at yahoo.com>,
	"cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Connecting to third party CUCM via ICT trunk
Message-ID: <56549.38471.qm at web111306.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I would suggest you upgrade and use IME which was created for this exact purpose...but that's obviously not the answer you were looking for. . .


________________________________
From: Damian Turburville <d_turburville at yahoo.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 7:30 AM
Subject: [cisco-voip] Connecting to third party CUCM via ICT trunk


Hi,
I am looking for some advice. I have a CUCM 6.1 system at one of my sites and we have a third-party who is on our WAN (but controls their own LAN and servers etc) who also has a Call Manager (not sure what revision) and they would like to make calls between the two sites. I was thinking it would probably be fairly easy to setup an ICT trunk between the two systems but I am sure our security team would have some issues with that. Is there any way of making the trunk more secure? Locking down ports on the firewall etc, maybe some kind of VPN connection? Is there anyone out there that has done this that could share their experiences?
Many thanks,
Damian

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 91, Issue 31
******************************************



More information about the cisco-voip mailing list