[cisco-voip] more RSVP

[Wellnitz, Erick A.]

Found my answer a bit further into the system guide in a 'note'.

"RSVP does not conflict with Automated Alternate Routing (AAR), which continues to function if AAR is configured."

What I take that to mean is where it says the call would fail, AAR kicks in and routes the call.

From: Scott Voll [mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 9:37 AM
To: Wellnitz, Erick A.
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] more RSVP

Please note I don't know for sure..... because I'm still looking at it.... but my understanding is that if your Running CM 8+ that is tied in with RSVP and it shows not enough BW it would fail over to the AAR configuration.

But that's just how I understand it, not that I have experience yet.

Scott
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Wellnitz, Erick A. <erick.wellnitz at kattenlaw.com<mailto:erick.wellnitz at kattenlaw.com>> wrote:
I've done a bit more reading on RSVP.  What I still haven't figured out is this:

If your locations based bandwidth between two locations is insufficient to make a call AND you have RSVP set will the call still fail back to the PSTN using AAR or does RSVP throw a monkey wrench into the works with AAR?

I'll probably have more questions as I dig deeper into RSVP and how it may help or hinder us compared to locations based CAC alone.

ERICK A. WELLNITZ
Network Engineer
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
525 W. Monroe Street / Chicago, IL 60661-3693
p / (312) 577-8041<tel:%28312%29%20577-8041> f / (312) 577-8875<tel:%28312%29%20577-8875>
erick.wellnitz at kattenlaw.com<mailto:erick.wellnitz at kattenlaw.com> / www.kattenlaw.com<http://www.kattenlaw.com/>


===========================================================

CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to Regulations Governing Practice Before the Internal Revenue

Service, any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used

by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.

===========================================================

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive

use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is

proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you

are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or

distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction.  Please notify

the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original

message without making any copies.

===========================================================

NOTIFICATION:  Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability partnership that has

elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997).

===========================================================


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110628/e13619e5/attachment.html>