[cisco-voip] Unity Connection 8.5 Single Mailbox, any limitation?

[Ki Wi]

It will be interacting with exchange 2010 but users will be on 2003 for the next 3 mth or so. It seems like unity connection can't track the user email account movement from 2003 to 2010 after migration. So I told the customer, let's integrate after everyone is on exchange 2010 or enable the single mailbox on adhoc basis after the user is moved to 2010.

Sent from my iPhone
Pls pardon my fat fingers.

On Mar 11, 2011, at 10:17 PM, Ryan West <rwest at zyedge.com> wrote:

> Exchange 2003 or 2010?  My biggest hang-ups have been authentication at the virtual directory level.  The error information at the test screen can be less than helpful, you’ll need RTMT to gather the tomcat logs or save yourself some time by figuring out all your authentication schemes ahead of time.  For 2003, checking IIS is usually enough.  For 2010, I would trust powershell ‘Get-WebServicesVirtualDirectory | fl *auth*’
> 
>  
> 
> HTH
> 
>  
> 
> -ryan
> 
>  
> 
> From: Ki Wi [mailto:kiwi.voice at gmail.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 10:47 PM
> To: Ryan West
> Cc: Anthony Holloway; Cisco VoIP List
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection 8.5 Single Mailbox, any limitation?
> 
>  
> 
> Great! I'm worried that email content is being sync as well. 
> 
>  
> 
> I have one upcoming deployment on this. Hope it's a smooth one. 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> Pls pardon my fat fingers.
> 
> 
> On Mar 11, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Ryan West <rwest at zyedge.com> wrote:
> 
> There are synchronized copies of the voicemail messages only, so as you check them at your computer, the MWI light will go off and if it’s deleted from either side, it will be replicated.  The idea is AD/GC can be down, but you will still be able to receive and listen to messages and those messages will sync up once CAS or backend comes back online.
> 
>  
> 
> -ryan
> 
>  
> 
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Anthony Holloway
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:56 PM
> To: Ki Wi
> Cc: Cisco VoIP List
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection 8.5 Single Mailbox, any limitation?
> 
>  
> 
> Based on your comment, it sounds like there will be two copies of every email, and voicemail: one on exchange, and one on Unity.  That can't be right.  Is it?
> 
>  
> 
> Anthony
> 
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Ki Wi <kiwi.voice at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> With Single Mailbox, it seems like e-mail content will replicated from exchange to CUC and voicemail will be replicated from CUC to exchange. Am I right?
> 
> What if one day, the database size grows beyond CUC's mailbox datastore size? What will happen?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 
>  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110311/541e5776/attachment.html>