[cisco-voip] Cisco ATA 187 and connection plar

Anthony Kouloglou akoul at dataways.gr
Thu May 5 02:19:21 EDT 2011


Hi Florian,
i have no problem with the ATA 186; it is what Ryan said.
Unfortunatelly, i haven't been able to try it with 187.
As soon as i do, i will share it with you.

Best Regards
Anthony

On 4/5/2011 23:23, Florian Kroessbacher wrote:
>
> Hy,
>
> maybe it helps. On our ATA186 Plar only works with one Key pressed on 
> the analog phone
>
> ----
> Florian Kroessbacher
>
> Am 04.05.2011 um 17:02 schrieb Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com 
> <mailto:rratliff at cisco.com>>:
>
>> I don't know much at all about the ATA 187 but nothing in the Admin 
>> Guide leads me to believe it's a feature the ATA supports itself.
>>
>> The data sheet did have the words "dial plan" on it but I have no 
>> idea what that specifically references.  I'd say you are in the realm 
>> of try it and see if it works or not.
>>
>> If it doesn't work and is a feature you need then you need to get in 
>> touch with your account team to have them get a feature request in 
>> for the ATA.
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>> On May 4, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Anthony Kouloglou wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ryan,
>> what do you mean "to be configured on the ATA itself" ?
>> Is it possible to configure this way an ATA 187?
>>
>> On 4/5/2011 17:46, Ryan Ratliff wrote:
>>> On a VG where you configure dial-peers you can configure 'connection 
>>> plar' on the voice-port just as you would on any other router that 
>>> is not controlled by CUCM.
>>>
>>> The ATA is the tricky one.  It likely did not exist at the time that 
>>> doc was written and so if it supports SIP dial rules from CUCM it'll 
>>> work.  If it doesn't then any plar functionality would have to be 
>>> configured on the ATA itself.
>>>
>>> -Ryan
>>>
>>> On May 4, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>>>
>>> According to that doc:
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *Note *Only Cisco Unified IP Phones 7940/41, 7960/61, and 7970/71 
>>> support PLAR for SIP.
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Guess that means if you need analog PLAR, you need VG224/202/204 
>>> running something else other than SIP?
>>>
>>> Good to know.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>>> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
>>> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
>>>                               - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From:*"Ryan Ratliff" <rratliff at cisco.com <mailto:rratliff at cisco.com>>
>>> *To:*"Anthony Kouloglou" <akoul at dataways.gr <mailto:akoul at dataways.gr>>
>>> *Cc:*"cisco-voip at puck-nether.net 
>>> <mailto:cisco-voip at puck-nether.net>" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
>>> <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>>
>>> *Sent:*Wednesday, May 4, 2011 10:22:34 AM
>>> *Subject:*Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco ATA 187 and connection plar
>>>
>>> SIP phones don't signal offhook to CUCM in the same way SCCP phones 
>>> do so there is no opportunity for CUCM to treat it as a call with no 
>>> dialed number.
>>>
>>> For SIP you need to configure dial rules.
>>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmsys/a03adial.html#wpmkr1039674
>>>
>>> -Ryan
>>>
>>> On May 4, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Anthony Kouloglou wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, i have followed cisco recommendations to simulate hot line 
>>> support for CUCM 7.1.5.
>>> These recommendations are:
>>> created a blank translation pattern that has a partition that is 
>>> included only in a css that a few devices have.
>>> This TP, has an Called Party Transform mask mask of a target DN.
>>> So, when, one of these phones go offhook, it matches this TP and 
>>> dials the appropriate number.
>>> But this does not seem to work with ATA 187.
>>> Is does nothing when picking up the phone.
>>> Does it has to do with SIP?
>>> Has anyone tried it before?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110505/e090a9f9/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list