[cisco-voip] Cisco ATA 187 and connection plar

Thu May 5 19:50:42 EDT 2011

The VG200 series (VG202, VG204, VG224) as well any Cisco routers with the appropriate voice ports can be setup to do what you want.  I have lines in a VG224 setup as SCCP lines in CM, with that very functionality in place, and it works just fine.

Matthew Ballard

Network Manager

Otis College of Art and Design

mballard at otis.edu

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Anthony Kouloglou
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 7:09 AM
To: Ryan Ratliff
Cc: cisco-voip at puck-nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco ATA 187 and connection plar

Hi all,
it does not work with ATA187 :-(
I don't know if there is a way to overcome the problem.
I am really desperate.
Why can't cisco create a sip dial rule that works with that?
ATA 187 is from the same vendor that makes the Call Manager: CiSCO!!
You may have tones of them in places that you want that feature (elevators, lobbys, bathrooms).
It is really hard to believe...

On 4/5/2011 18:02, Ryan Ratliff wrote: 

I don't know much at all about the ATA 187 but nothing in the Admin Guide leads me to believe it's a feature the ATA supports itself. 

The data sheet did have the words "dial plan" on it but I have no idea what that specifically references.  I'd say you are in the realm of try it and see if it works or not.

If it doesn't work and is a feature you need then you need to get in touch with your account team to have them get a feature request in for the ATA.

-Ryan

On May 4, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Anthony Kouloglou wrote:

Hi Ryan,
what do you mean "to be configured on the ATA itself" ?
Is it possible to configure this way an ATA 187?

On 4/5/2011 17:46, Ryan Ratliff wrote: 

On a VG where you configure dial-peers you can configure 'connection plar' on the voice-port just as you would on any other router that is not controlled by CUCM. 

The ATA is the tricky one.  It likely did not exist at the time that doc was written and so if it supports SIP dial rules from CUCM it'll work.  If it doesn't then any plar functionality would have to be configured on the ATA itself.

-Ryan

On May 4, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:

According to that doc:

________________________________

Note  <http://www.cisco.com/en/US/i/templates/blank.gif> Only Cisco Unified IP Phones 7940/41, 7960/61, and 7970/71 support PLAR for SIP.

________________________________

Guess that means if you need analog PLAR, you need VG224/202/204 running something else other than SIP?

Good to know.

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
                              - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)

________________________________

From: "Ryan Ratliff" <rratliff at cisco.com>
To: "Anthony Kouloglou" <akoul at dataways.gr>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck-nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2011 10:22:34 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco ATA 187 and connection plar

SIP phones don't signal offhook to CUCM in the same way SCCP phones do so there is no opportunity for CUCM to treat it as a call with no dialed number.  

For SIP you need to configure dial rules.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmsys/a03adial.html#wpmkr1039674

-Ryan

On May 4, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Anthony Kouloglou wrote:

Hi, i have followed cisco recommendations to simulate hot line support for CUCM 7.1.5.
These recommendations are:
created a blank translation pattern that has a partition that is included only in a css that a few devices have.
This TP, has an Called Party Transform mask mask of a target DN.
So, when, one of these phones go offhook, it matches this TP and dials the appropriate number.
But this does not seem to work with ATA 187.
Is does nothing when picking up the phone. 
Does it has to do with SIP?
Has anyone tried it before?

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110505/96bd4d9a/attachment.html>