[cisco-voip] Cisco ATA 187 and connection plar

Fri May 6 05:23:10 EDT 2011

Hi Thanks for the update, and Lelio too,
but i do have 3 dozens of ATA 187 since cisco could not provide me 186 
(they were end of sale).
They told me that they are replacements for ATA 186.
I could expect from them to do the appropriate clarification.
I am really, really frustrated.

On 6/5/2011 02:50, Matthew Ballard wrote:
>
> The VG200 series (VG202, VG204, VG224) as well any Cisco routers with 
> the appropriate voice ports can be setup to do what you want.  I have 
> lines in a VG224 setup as SCCP lines in CM, with that very 
> functionality in place, and it works just fine.
>
> Matthew Ballard
>
> Network Manager
>
> Otis College of Art and Design
>
> mballard at otis.edu <mailto:mballard at otis.edu>
>
> *From:*cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net 
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Anthony 
> Kouloglou
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 05, 2011 7:09 AM
> *To:* Ryan Ratliff
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck-nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco ATA 187 and connection plar
>
> Hi all,
> it does not work with ATA187 :-(
> I don't know if there is a way to overcome the problem.
> I am really desperate.
> Why can't cisco create a sip dial rule that works with that?
> ATA 187 is from the same vendor that makes the Call Manager: CiSCO!!
> You may have tones of them in places that you want that feature 
> (elevators, lobbys, bathrooms).
> It is really hard to believe...
>
>
> On 4/5/2011 18:02, Ryan Ratliff wrote:
>
> I don't know much at all about the ATA 187 but nothing in the Admin 
> Guide leads me to believe it's a feature the ATA supports itself.
>
> The data sheet did have the words "dial plan" on it but I have no idea 
> what that specifically references.  I'd say you are in the realm of 
> try it and see if it works or not.
>
> If it doesn't work and is a feature you need then you need to get in 
> touch with your account team to have them get a feature request in for 
> the ATA.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On May 4, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Anthony Kouloglou wrote:
>
> Hi Ryan,
> what do you mean "to be configured on the ATA itself" ?
> Is it possible to configure this way an ATA 187?
>
> On 4/5/2011 17:46, Ryan Ratliff wrote:
>
> On a VG where you configure dial-peers you can configure 'connection 
> plar' on the voice-port just as you would on any other router that is 
> not controlled by CUCM.
>
> The ATA is the tricky one.  It likely did not exist at the time that 
> doc was written and so if it supports SIP dial rules from CUCM it'll 
> work.  If it doesn't then any plar functionality would have to be 
> configured on the ATA itself.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On May 4, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
>
>
> According to that doc:
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *Note *Only Cisco Unified IP Phones 7940/41, 7960/61, and 7970/71 
> support PLAR for SIP.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Guess that means if you need analog PLAR, you need VG224/202/204 
> running something else other than SIP?
>
> Good to know.
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
>                               - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:*"Ryan Ratliff" <rratliff at cisco.com <mailto:rratliff at cisco.com>>
> *To:*"Anthony Kouloglou" <akoul at dataways.gr <mailto:akoul at dataways.gr>>
> *Cc:*"cisco-voip at puck-nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck-nether.net>" 
> <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>>
> *Sent:*Wednesday, May 4, 2011 10:22:34 AM
> *Subject:*Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco ATA 187 and connection plar
>
> SIP phones don't signal offhook to CUCM in the same way SCCP phones do 
> so there is no opportunity for CUCM to treat it as a call with no 
> dialed number.
>
> For SIP you need to configure dial rules.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmsys/a03adial.html#wpmkr1039674
>
> -Ryan
>
> On May 4, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Anthony Kouloglou wrote:
>
> Hi, i have followed cisco recommendations to simulate hot line support 
> for CUCM 7.1.5.
> These recommendations are:
> created a blank translation pattern that has a partition that is 
> included only in a css that a few devices have.
> This TP, has an Called Party Transform mask mask of a target DN.
> So, when, one of these phones go offhook, it matches this TP and dials 
> the appropriate number.
> But this does not seem to work with ATA 187.
> Is does nothing when picking up the phone.
> Does it has to do with SIP?
> Has anyone tried it before?
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20110506/8f1ea432/attachment.html>