[cisco-voip] anyone using SEC (simple event correlator) ?

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

nevermind, looks like it's working. 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 


----- Original Message -----
From: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 
To: "Cisco VoIPoE List" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 1:51:38 PM 
Subject: [cisco-voip] anyone using SEC (simple event correlator) ? 



Just wondering if anyone out there is using SEC (simple event correlator) ? 

I'm trying to use a single with threshold alarm, but the way I'm writing it I'm tracking alarms from multiple devices rather than from a single device. 



--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 



_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20111129/fb4cf6f8/attachment.html>