[cisco-voip] SAIC doesnt know crap about CIsco

Scott Voll svoll.voip at gmail.com
Thu Oct 6 14:02:47 EDT 2011


Not sure If I understand the question. but yes they could have created the
36xx extensions and did a translation pattern.  But as for me..... I sure
like having my DN and DID be the same.

YMMV

Scott

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:54 AM, SouthEast Texas Telecom <
SETXTELECOM at att.net> wrote:

> OK….I have a question for the brain trust…****
>
> ** **
>
> A CISCO system replaces a ROLM CBX…the DIDs has been nxx-06xx and
> translated inbound by the CBX to 36xx extns…****
>
> ** **
>
> SAIC does the CISCO install…..and CHANGES THE EXTENSIONS to (yep!!)
> 06xx!!!! WHAT THE HELL??
>
> DON’T TELL ME (and I know the answer…I am doing my CCNA, etc now) that they
> could NOT do translation and keep the same dialing numbers, etc…****
>
> ** **
>
> CAN ANYONE try to justify these idiots??  (I plan to BLAST them at the next
> stockholders meeting….TOTAL IDIOTS)****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks****
>
> Chris****
>
> (BTW I was the one who did the ROLM in 1981 and added DIDs and PHONEMAIL to
> it…KEPT the SWITCH up as we added the PM wiring and cabling…and didn’t drop
> a screw!! Sure enough PM came up with NO downtime in the CBX)****
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20111006/8f78e904/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list