[cisco-voip] SAIC doesnt know crap about CIsco

[Norton, Mike]

My guess:

Nobody told them they wanted the internal extensions to be 36xx. The “norm” is for the internal extensions to be the last four digits of DID, so they rightly may have walked in to the project thinking that that’s what was desired. Yes, they could have kept the same numbers as the old system. But did anyone tell them that the old system was that way?

Sounds more like a project management oversight than a case of “total idiots.”

--
Mike Norton
I.T. Support
Peace Wapiti School Division No. 76
Helpdesk: 780-831-3080
Direct: 780-831-3076


From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of SouthEast Texas Telecom
Sent: October-06-11 11:55 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] SAIC doesnt know crap about CIsco

OK….I have a question for the brain trust…

A CISCO system replaces a ROLM CBX…the DIDs has been nxx-06xx and translated inbound by the CBX to 36xx extns…

SAIC does the CISCO install…..and CHANGES THE EXTENSIONS to (yep!!)   06xx!!!! WHAT THE HELL??

DON’T TELL ME (and I know the answer…I am doing my CCNA, etc now) that they could NOT do translation and keep the same dialing numbers, etc…

CAN ANYONE try to justify these idiots??  (I plan to BLAST them at the next stockholders meeting….TOTAL IDIOTS)

Thanks
Chris
(BTW I was the one who did the ROLM in 1981 and added DIDs and PHONEMAIL to it…KEPT the SWITCH up as we added the PM wiring and cabling…and didn’t drop a screw!! Sure enough PM came up with NO downtime in the CBX)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20111006/226e6931/attachment.html>