[cisco-voip] Session Border Controllers

[Matt Slaga (AM)]

For any case that a pure SBC is needed, IMO, ACME is the way to go.  When was the last time TAC rewrote IOS software the same day you introduced a bug to them?



From: randal k [mailto:rkohutek at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 12:21 AM
To: Matt Slaga (AM); cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Session Border Controllers



Is this the case for CUBE, or are you talking about CUBE-SP? Enterprise CUBE is pretty limited, but CUBE-SP -- running on the ASRs -- is a completely different monster and has a tremendous feature set.

Thanks,
Randal
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Matt Slaga (AM) <matt.slaga at dimensiondata.com<mailto:matt.slaga at dimensiondata.com>> wrote:
Yes, I've configured and troubleshot several ACME SBCs.  IMHO, if you need SBC capabilities, ACME has CUBE beat hands down.


itevomcid
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20111007/19a7ad4f/attachment.html>