[cisco-voip] Session Border Controllers
Paul
asobihoudai at yahoo.com
Fri Oct 7 11:02:32 EDT 2011
Someone mentioned using freeswitch as an SBC...what's the process of getting that working with CCM and how difficult is it?
________________________________
From: Matt Slaga (AM) <matt.slaga at dimensiondata.com>
To: randal k <rkohutek at gmail.com>; "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Friday, October 7, 2011 6:10 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Session Border Controllers
For any case that a pure SBC is needed, IMO, ACME is the way to go. When was the last time TAC rewrote IOS software the same day you introduced a bug to them?
From:randal k [mailto:rkohutek at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 12:21 AM
To: Matt Slaga (AM); cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Session Border Controllers
Is this the case for CUBE, or are you talking about CUBE-SP? Enterprise CUBE is pretty limited, but CUBE-SP -- running on the ASRs -- is a completely different monster and has a tremendous feature set.
Thanks,
Randal
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Matt Slaga (AM) <matt.slaga at dimensiondata.com> wrote:
Yes, I’ve configured and troubleshot several ACME SBCs. IMHO, if you need SBC capabilities, ACME has CUBE beat hands down.
itevomcid
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20111007/7249c182/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list