[cisco-voip] Best match?????
    Lelio Fulgenzi 
    lelio at uoguelph.ca
       
    Wed Oct 26 16:24:18 EDT 2011
    
    
  
But Scott said it matches the @ based route pattern first, not the ! based route pattern. 
>From what I read in your response, you're saying it should match the ! based route pattern? 
I agree that it has something to do with the macro and how it expands only possible values, so, let's say area codes that only begin with 2-9, not 0-9. it must create a smaller number of international patterns, i.e. only country codes that are valid. 
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com> 
To: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com> 
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 4:12:08 PM 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Best match????? 
@ is not a "pattern". It is a "macro" that expands out to many patterns. 
9.011! with the supplied number of digits is a 'closer match' than the international pattern added by the 9.@ macro. 
/Wes 
On Oct 26, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Scott Voll wrote: 
I have a CSS Lets call unresticted. 
inside unrestricted I have two partitions, lets call US and International. 
inside US I have a 9.@ route 
and inside International I have a 9.011! 
The CSS list International first. 
What does a number such as 9011 52 123 1234567 not match the international but rather the US 9.@? wouldn't 9.011! be a better match? 
Thanks 
Scott 
_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20111026/3bf2eb3f/attachment.html>
    
    
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list