[cisco-voip] Best match?????

[Wellnitz, Erick A.]

Sorry forgot to include the group.

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Wellnitz, Erick A." <erick.wellnitz at kattenlaw.com<mailto:erick.wellnitz at kattenlaw.com>>
Date: October 27, 2011 8:04:19 AM CDT
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Best match?????

I think another aspect being missed is that ! Is any number of digits and is always subject to inter-digit timeout.

Therefore,  9011! would never be cbosen over the 9@ macro.

9011!# would eliminate idt and would be matched...provided users can be trained to press # as a dialstring terminator.

On Oct 26, 2011, at 4:07 PM, "Lelio Fulgenzi" <<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>> wrote:

My guess is because there are no country codes that start with 1 (just googled), the @ macro reduces the number of possible matches by at least two if not three digits, i.e. 1X or 1XX that the ! marker would give.

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
                              - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)


________________________________
From: "Scott Voll" <<mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com>svoll.voip at gmail.com<mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com>>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>>
Cc: "Wes Sisk" <<mailto:wsisk at cisco.com>wsisk at cisco.com<mailto:wsisk at cisco.com>>, <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 4:54:57 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Best match?????

Correct.... that's why I'm scratching my head....

Scott

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca><mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>> wrote:
But Scott said it matches the @ based route pattern first, not the ! based route pattern.

>From what I read in your response, you're saying it should match the ! based route pattern?

I agree that it has something to do with the macro and how it expands only possible values, so, let's say area codes that only begin with 2-9, not 0-9. it must create a smaller number of international patterns, i.e. only country codes that are valid.



________________________________
From: "Wes Sisk" <<mailto:wsisk at cisco.com><mailto:wsisk at cisco.com>wsisk at cisco.com<mailto:wsisk at cisco.com>>
To: "Scott Voll" <<mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com><mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com>svoll.voip at gmail.com<mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com>>
Cc: <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 4:12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Best match?????


@ is not a "pattern". It is a "macro" that expands out to many patterns.

9.011! with the supplied number of digits is a 'closer match' than the international pattern added by the 9.@ macro.

/Wes

On Oct 26, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Scott Voll wrote:

I have a CSS Lets call unresticted.

inside unrestricted I have two partitions, lets call US and International.

inside US I have a 9.@ route

and inside International I have a 9.011!

The CSS list International first.

What does a number such as 9011 52 123 1234567 not match the international but rather the US 9.@?  wouldn't 9.011! be a better match?

Thanks

Scott
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net><mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip><https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net><mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip><https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

===========================================================
CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to Regulations Governing Practice Before the Internal Revenue
Service, any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used
by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
===========================================================
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive
use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is
proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or 
distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction.  Please notify
the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original 
message without making any copies.
===========================================================
NOTIFICATION:  Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability partnership that has
elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997).
===========================================================