[cisco-voip] 8.6.2a SU1 - anyone deployed it?

[Florian Kroessbacher]

Hy Out there.

Upgraded my One Machine CuCM Test with no Problem.

On our 2 Machine Test Cluster we upgrade from 8.5.1SU3 to 8.6(2a)SU1 and
hitted this BUG
CSCtz30396 : SCCP Phones Do Not Register With Certain Station KeepAlive
Intervals

Our KeepAlive Intervals before Upgrade had been
Station and Backup Server KeepAlive = 20 (Default 30)
Station and Backup Server KeepAlive Interval = 60 (Default)

To reregister Our SCCP Phones we put the follwing Settings in

Station and Backup Server KeepAlive = 15 (Default 30)
Station and Backup Server KeepAlive Interval = 40 (Default)

cheers
Florian Kroessbacher

gmail: florian.kroessbacher at gmail.com



Am 19. April 2012 21:50 schrieb Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila <
jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com>:

> Running it on two deployments locally, no problems at all.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *Jorge Rodriguez Aguila, CCVP-Voice*
>
> *Senior Voice/Data Consultant*
>
> *Netxar Technologies*
>
> jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com****
>
> 787-688-8530****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Ratliff
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 18, 2012 12:08 PM
> *To:* Erick Wellnitz
> *Cc:* cisco-voip
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] 8.6.2a SU1 - anyone deployed it?****
>
> ** **
>
> The SU is chock full o' bug fixes and if you are going to 8.6(2) anyway
> then I can't think of a valid reason not to to straight to it.****
>
> ** **
>
> -Ryan****
>
> ** **
>
> On Apr 18, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Erick Wellnitz wrote:****
>
> ** **
>
> I'm about to do an upgrade from CUCM 6.1.x to 8.6.x - I'm going to go
> about it the hard way (clean install, etc.) in order to clean the system up.
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> Has anyone deployed the 8.6(2)SU1 yet?  I'm reading the release notes and
> the claim is that there are only 7 open caveats.  I find this extremely
> hard to believe  but if it is true they all seem fairly minor so this would
> be the version I would go with.  Even the ones in bug toolkit seem
> realtively minor depending on your environment.****
>
>  ****
>
> Any input would be great.****
>
>  ****
>
> Thanks!****
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120420/133db6fc/attachment.html>