[cisco-voip] Cisco AS5000 vs ISR3900

[Joel Perez]

Its my understanding that you cant use local resources on the as5xxx series
with CM.

Joel P.
On Aug 2, 2012 9:39 AM, "Pawlowski, Adam" <ajp26 at buffalo.edu> wrote:

> I’m looking at some products to try and replace our 6509s and CMMs, which
> will eventually be EoS/EoL. The notification recommends the ISR series of
> devices, with PVDMs and VWICs. Since our goal is to eventually operate a
> CUBE, and transition to SIP trunking, with potential for fallback to a
> couple of PRIs, this platform would appear capable. Unfortunately, it looks
> like it also can do “a bunch of other stuff”, which would imply that it is
> expensive, and licensing will be involved for many of the features of the
> device.****
>
> ** **
>
> The AS5350XM seems like it would do the same thing? The session count is
> listed at 800 sessions each for CUBE, and it’s a platform license, which
> would mean that should we configure 3 of these at unique sites, where we
> have 6-8 PRIs now, that we would be able to more-than dump the entire call
> capacity to one of these units in case of failure, with room to spare.****
>
> ** **
>
> It doesn’t appear it does ISDN backhaul to CCM, not that it was designed
> to, so it would have to be configured with a SIP trunk to the UCM, is that
> right?****
>
> ** **
>
> Any other comments? Would this put us on the pain train?****
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120802/d83288f5/attachment.html>