[cisco-voip] t.38

[Nate VanMaren]

VG224 is not the limiting factor on NSE based standards based (protocol based).  It's the control protocol, where SCCP can only do NSE, and the others can do standards.



From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ted Nugent
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 2:29 PM
To: Scott Voll
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] t.38

Possibly, depending how your vg224s and PSTN gateways are configured... Last I knew VG224 only supports T.38 NSE, not standards based T.38 so be careful of that. Changing the fax protocol should be a coordinated effort between the PSTN gateway and the Analog gateways to make sure nothing breaks.

Here's a good writeup on the supported fax protocols with sample configs.

http://www.icciev.com/1/post/2011/9/adding-vg224-to-cucm-80-as-sccp-or-mgcp-gateway-differences-and-configurations-part-1.html




On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com<mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com>> wrote:
I have faxes running through VG224's on my network.  if I turn on t.38 support will that brake them?

Thanks

Scott

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120831/564ab044/attachment.html>