[cisco-voip] masking number in CUCM 8.5
abbas Wali
abbaseo at gmail.com
Wed Dec 19 13:54:50 EST 2012
i have used all sorts of variations
the full number is 011591XXXXX.
just did another experiment on it. created a RP 9.9441033 enabled the Use
Calling Party's External Phone Number Mask check box
on the phone line settings used any defaced number eg 6666 (any but 52031
works)
tracked the call on the gateway and could see the call going through
successfully.
now the situation is that that site has 20/30 odd numbers, cant create RP
for each one. have to enabled the called party external phone number mask
for the local 9.@ patterns. but have to understand will it affect anything
else!!!
thanks
On 19 December 2012 18:42, Jason Burns <burns.jason at gmail.com> wrote:
> Abbas,
>
> What is the proper DID for this number "52031"?
>
> I recommend using an External Phone Number Mask and ensuring that the
> number sent as the calling number has the correct number of digits. This
> should be the same number as the E164 DID, or the E164 number minus the
> country code. That seems like you're missing a few digits below. I've seen
> providers drop calls when a calling number isn't the correct length.
>
> In the US I'd also recommend sending the call with the correct plan and
> type as well instead of just Unknown/Unknown.
>
> -Jason
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:57 AM, abbas Wali <abbaseo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '52031'
>>
>> Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
>>
>
>
--
@bbas..
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20121219/cbd345fe/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list