[cisco-voip] Calls to internal numbers fail

Jonathan Charles jonvoip at gmail.com
Sun Feb 5 17:19:35 EST 2012


I have too, the culprit is proxy arp... the gateway here is a Cisco 4510R+E


J

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Mike King <me at mpking.com> wrote:

> What's the default gateway on the subnet?
>
> I've seen ASA's do weird things, even to L2 networks.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> All phones are on the same subnet.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Bob Zanett (AM) <
>> bob.zanett at dimensiondata.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This could be a routing issue.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Can your phones see each other at the IP level?   CUCM is what controls
>>> call setup/teardown and sends messages to ring your phone.  So in theory,
>>> if CUCM sees both IP subnets but the subnet A phones can’t see subnet B
>>> phones’ IPs.    Phone from A calling phone in B, phone will ring but not be
>>> able to be answered.  It will drop.  ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Cheers -****
>>>
>>> Bob Zanett****
>>>
>>> Technical Services Architect****
>>>
>>> Dimension Data Americas****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
>>> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Ted Nugent
>>> *Sent:* Friday, February 03, 2012 2:17 PM
>>> *To:* Jonathan Charles
>>>
>>> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Calls to internal numbers fail****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Guess I missed that in your orginal post!****
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:****
>>>
>>> Replication to where? This is  a CUCUMBEr****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Jonathan****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Ted Nugent <tednugent73 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:****
>>>
>>> I'd be looking at replication issues first off****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:****
>>>
>>> Already did that, and deleted all.****
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:45 AM, A A <cciefob at gmail.com> wrote:****
>>>
>>> Check route plan report and filter by unassigned DN and delete them ****
>>>
>>> On Feb 3, 2012 10:24 AM, "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com> wrote:**
>>> **
>>>
>>> We have phones at a site that cannot call eache other.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> The phones are in the phones_pt and have a css of internal_css.
>>> Internal_css has phones_pt as the first partition in its css.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Calls ring once and drop.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> CCM version is 7.1.5.33900-10****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Just an FYI, calls from the gateway, which has a CSS of gateway_css, and
>>> also has the phones_pt as its first pt, work fine.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> We have checked for duplicate translations, route patterns and have
>>> found nothing.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Any ideas?****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Jonathan****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip****
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> itevomcid ****
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120205/56336786/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list