[cisco-voip] phones deleted during user garbage collection

[Dennis Heim]

Moderate… if it is deleting phones as part of the GC process, I would call that sev1.

Dennis Heim
Senior Engineer (Unified Communications)
CDW  Advanced Technology Services
10610 9th Place
Bellevue, WA 98004

425.310.5299 Single Number Reach (WA)
317.569.4255 Single Number Reach (IN)
317.569.4201 Fax
dennis.heim at cdw.com<mailto:dennis.heim at cdw.com>
cdw.com/content/solutions/unified-communications/<http://www.cdw.com/content/solutions/unified-communications/>

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 4:24 PM
To: Wes Sisk
Cc: Cisco List VoIP
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] phones deleted during user garbage collection

moderate? ayieeeeeeeee!

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
                              - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)

________________________________
From: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com<mailto:wsisk at cisco.com>>
To: "Eric Pedersen" <PedersenE at bennettjones.com<mailto:PedersenE at bennettjones.com>>
Cc: "Cisco List VoIP" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>>
Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2012 4:21:37 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] phones deleted during user garbage collection

CSCtl20458    Phones associated with inactive end users are deleted during GC

On Feb 9, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Eric Pedersen wrote:

We have Callmanager 8 configured for LDAP synchronization with AD.  When users are disabled in Active Directory, the nightly garbage collection is removing them from Callmanager as expected, but it sometimes is also deleting their phones.  Has anyone seen this? It happened a couple days ago and I was able to get the Callmanager logs and definitely see the devices being deleted at 3:15. This doesn't seem like correct behavior to me.

Thanks,
Eric


The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged

subject matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact

the sender and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication,

e-mail communications may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized

parties. If you do not wish us to communicate with you by e-mail, please

notify us at your earliest convenience. In the absence of such

notification, your consent is assumed. Should you choose to allow us to

communicate by e-mail, we will not take any additional security measures

(such as encryption) unless specifically requested.



_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120210/266e94f3/attachment.html>