[cisco-voip] Split 1 publisher and 2 subscribers into 2 independent publishers and 1 subscriber

[Ted Nugent]

I don't think its a mater of "not supported" but more of "not a good idea"
Performing the rebuild as pub and restore from backup is not a big deal but
your problem will be getting another application license
You're essentially building another cluster which requires all new
licensing.


On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Fred Hunt <fhunt at cogdell.com> wrote:

>  Currently we have one publisher and one subscriber in one office and a
> subscriber in a remote office.  A company split is occurring and I am
> wondering if I can take the remote site subscriber and make it an
> independent publisher.  I’ve heard that it is against Cisco best practices
> to only have a publisher and no subscribers, but I cannot find anything
> explicitly stating that.  My “Administering Cisco Unified Communications
> Manager 7.0” book states “While it is possible to have a Cisco Unified
> Communications Manager cluster of only one server, it is not recommended
> due to the lack of failover protection if the server fails.”  I am aware of
> the risk involved due to lack of redundancy, but this may only be
> temporary.  ****
>
> ** **
>
> Is anyone aware of documentation that specifically states this is
> unsupported?****
>
> Does anybody have experience operating with only a publisher?****
>
> Is there a process involved to convert a subscriber to a publisher?****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks****
>
> Fred****
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120113/9ac2f3fc/attachment.html>