[cisco-voip] H323 Gateway needed for SNR mid-call features?
Lelio Fulgenzi
lelio at uoguelph.ca
Mon Mar 12 17:31:56 EDT 2012
Thanks Nick!
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Matthews" <matthnick at gmail.com>
To: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com>
Cc: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, "Nate VanMaren" <VanMarenNP at ldschurch.org>, "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net VOIP" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 1:06:45 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] H323 Gateway needed for SNR mid-call features?
Digital voice is basically PRI channels. Ex: the 2901 can fit 3-256
PVDM but doesn't have the horsepower to manage that many channels, so
it has a 100 digital voice channel capacity.
The metric you're going to be more interested in is VXML capacity.
It's pretty close to the CUBE and MTP numbers if you have those. They
aren't published since they're benchmarks and not promises. You can
contact your account team to get more details if you're not already
privy to that information.
-nick
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
> Apologies Lelio, but I honestly don't know. Maybe Nick can translate this
> marketing speak.
>
> On Mar 9, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> If I wanted to spec a couple of new routers for this purpose for
> active/active, active/standby, active/shelf (or whatever is available), what
> would I be looking at?
>
> Is one of these H323 hairpin calls considered a "digital voice" call as
> spec'ed here:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps10538/aag_c45_556315.pdf
>
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com>
> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> Cc: "Nate VanMaren" <VanMarenNP at ldschurch.org>,
> "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net VOIP" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Friday, March 9, 2012 11:49:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] H323 Gateway needed for SNR mid-call features?
>
> It's been tried and it leads to interesting scenarios. invoking features
> like transfer utilize the h323/sip router's dialplan rather than CUCM's.
> Then you configure peers to route to CUCM. IF you're tandeming through
> CUCM to get the h.323 gateway then you tandem back to cucm so you need
> ip-ip-gw functionality. then you have issues with SNR dial-peers
> overlapping/conflicting with SRST dial-peers. That leads to some
> interesting COR configuration. Down the rabbit hole.
>
> It was a fun lab and whiteboard session with several CCIE's. It could be
> made to work with numerous limitations. it's possible but may not be
> recommended for the masses without some very careful design and
> functionality choices.
>
> /wes
>
> On Mar 9, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> wonder if i could run the hairpinning on the same router that has the MGCP
> gateways. that would probably screw up any chance of getting SRST working
> without confusion though.
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "Nate VanMaren" <VanMarenNP at ldschurch.org>
> To: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com>, "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net VOIP" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Friday, March 9, 2012 11:02:23 AM
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] H323 Gateway needed for SNR mid-call features?
>
> I think SIP is ok too. Basically no MGCP because it can’t do the tcl/vxml.
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On
> Behalf Of Wes Sisk
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 8:50 AM
> To: Lelio Fulgenzi
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net VOIP
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] H323 Gateway needed for SNR mid-call features?
>
>
>
> my vague recollection is yes. mid call features depend on the h323 gateway
> listening in on the call and invoking a tcl or vxml script (increasing
> fuzziness here).
>
>
>
> On Mar 9, 2012, at 10:00 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
>
> OK, I'm pretty sure this is the case, but I'm just wondering if someone can
> confirm/deny.
>
> Do I need an H323 gateway for SNR mid-call features?
>
> The document talks about using H323 for mobile voice access, but I'm just
> wondering if this is a per-requisite for mid-call features like transfer,
> etc.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/fsmobmgr.pdf
>
> Thanks, Lelio
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
>
> NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
> and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
> review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
> copies of the original message.
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120312/1d1402de/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list