[cisco-voip] isdn status - layer 1 'shutdown'?

[Adam Piasecki]

show controller t1 # # - Will tell you that layer 1 is up (t1 is good)
show isdn status - Layer 2 will show "Multiframe established" (D Channel is
up)

On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Erick <ewellnitzvoip at gmail.com> wrote:

> Only difference is thst I see failed for LOS/LOF state.
>
> The provider is admitting an issue.  They are not able to reach the
> smartjack.  I also get nothing when I issue loopback local line on the
> controller.
>
>
> On May 2, 2012, at 5:08 PM, "Fuermann, Jason" <jason.f at shsu.edu> wrote:
>
>  What’s show controllers t1 0/0/0 brief tell you? My guess is you will
> see a remote alarm. Here is a PRI I’m waiting on to be provisioned.****
>
> ** **
>
> T1 0/0/0 is down.****
>
>   Applique type is Channelized T1****
>
>   Cablelength is short 110****
>
>   Receiver has remote alarm.****
>
>   alarm-trigger is not set****
>
>   Soaking time: 3, Clearance time: 10****
>
>   AIS State:Clear  LOS State:Clear  LOF State:Clear ****
>
>   Version info FPGA Rev: 08121917, FPGA Type: PRK4****
>
>   Framing is ESF, Line Code is B8ZS, Clock Source is Line.****
>
>   CRC Threshold is 320. Reported from firmware  is 320.****
>
>   Data in current interval (868 seconds elapsed):****
>
>      0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations****
>
>      0 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins****
>
>      0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 868 Unavail
> Secs****
>
>   Total Data (last 24 hours)****
>
>      0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations,****
>
>      0 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins,****
>
>      0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 86400 Unavail
> Secs****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Erick Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 02, 2012 5:03 PM
> *To:* Thomas Bader
> *Cc:* cisco-voip
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] isdn status - layer 1 'shutdown'?****
>
> ** **
>
> It stopped working this afternoon.****
>
>  ****
>
> The provider can't get to their smartjack so I guess I won't worry until
> they can test clean.****
>
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Thomas Bader <tbader at netcologne.de> wrote:
> ****
>
> ... has it been working before?
>
> From my experience Layer 1 is a cabling problem, even if it has been
> working before.
>
> All the best,
>
> Thomas
>
>
> Am 02.05.2012 um 22:16 schrieb Erick Wellnitz:
>
> > IOS 12.4(24)T7
> >
> > I have a PRI which had layer 1 in a 'deactivated' state.  I did a shut -
> no shut on the controller and now it shows shutdown.
> >
> > Is this to be expected or is there something I'm missing.
> >
> >
> > controller T1 0/0/0
> >  cablelength long 0db
> >  pri-group timeslots 1-24
> >  description pri
> >
> > linecode and framing are indeed the defaults of B8ZS and ESF
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip****
>
> ** **
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120502/e661b5d2/attachment.html>