[cisco-voip] CUWL and UCS activation

Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzvoip at gmail.com
Wed May 9 14:48:48 EDT 2012


This brings up another interesting question.

We have Unity 5.x HA with 224 ports (seems a bit odd but that's what the
system says).  Will we still need to order the HA license when migrating to
Connection and VMWare?

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Ted Nugent <tednugent73 at gmail.com> wrote:

> You'll need to order the Unity to Unity Connection migration via PUT. Once
> you get that you will take your old Unity license files send them to
> licensing at cisco.com (say a prayer, perhaps sacrafice a goat or chicken or
> something to appease the Cisco licensing gods), give them the new MAC
> address and the PAK for the Unity to Unity Connection migration, they may
> also ask for the SO# for the upgrade/migration so have that handy and they
> should send you back the migrated Unity licenses and the Unity Connection
> migration license which enables the Unity licenses on Unity Connection.
>
> Depending on the number of port you had on the old system or if you need
> an HA server you will probably want to order these $0 upgrades or something
> similar.
>
>  Product Description
> L-UNITYCN8-LIC-UPG Unity Connection 8.x, SW Feature License Add-ons
> L-UNCN8-ADD-PORT Unity Connection 8.x Add Ports
> L-UNCN8-HA-VMWARE Unity Connection 8.x HA for VMWare - eDelivery
> L-UNITYCN8-HA-PAK Unity Connection 8.x HA PAK
> L-UNITYCN8-PAK Unity Connection 8.x PAK
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzvoip at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Only items related to unity/unity connection are:
>>
>> UWL-UPG-CM+UTY-PRO
>>
>> No pak for unity.
>>
>> With that said, once I activate the UCSS paks I should be able to migrate
>> from Unity to Connection, correct?
>>
>>  On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Matthew Loraditch <
>> MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  If you got CUWL there should be a connection PAK if you look at your
>>> order detail one of the line items under the master CUWL part should have
>>> been said PAK
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Matthew G. Loraditch - CCVP, CCNA, CCDA
>>>
>>> 1965 Greenspring Drive
>>> Timonium, MD 21093
>>>
>>> voice. 410.252.8830
>>> fax.  410.252.9284
>>>
>>> Twitter <http://twitter.com/heliontech>  |  Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296>
>>> | Website <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>  |  Email Support<support at heliontechnologies.com?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [
>>> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] on behalf of Erick Wellnitz [
>>> ewellnitzvoip at gmail.com]
>>> *Sent:* Monday, May 07, 2012 3:59 PM
>>> *To:* Buchanan, James
>>> *Cc:* cisco-voip
>>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] CUWL and UCS activation
>>>
>>>  Okay...second question and I know these are probably fairly basic but
>>> as my first project at this firm I need to make sure I get it right.
>>>
>>> I have PAKs for everything (CUCM, SME, CUP, MeetingPlace) except for
>>> Connection.  Is this normal?   Do I even need a PAK for Connection or are
>>> the server licenses available by default on install and I jsut need to add
>>> the user/mailbox licenses?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Buchanan, James <jbuchanan at presidio.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>>  On this, I’ve always simply entered the ESW contract number and have
>>>> had no problems accessing the software.****
>>>>
>>>> ****
>>>>
>>>> *James Buchanan*|* UC Technology Manager *| *Presidio South *|*Presidio Networked Solutions
>>>> *****
>>>>
>>>> *12 Cadillac Dr Ste 130 Brentwood, TN 37027 *|* **
>>>> jbuchanan at presidio.com***
>>>>
>>>> *D: 615-866-5729* | *F:615-866-5781*  *www.presidio.com*<http://www.presidio.com/>
>>>> ****
>>>>
>>>> ****
>>>>
>>>> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
>>>> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Erick Wellnitz
>>>> *Sent:* Monday, May 07, 2012 2:37 PM
>>>> *To:* cisco-voip
>>>> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] CUWL and UCS activation****
>>>>
>>>> ****
>>>>
>>>> So, I was handed a box and told 'figure it out'.****
>>>>
>>>> ****
>>>>
>>>> Purchased for version 8.0 and none of the PAKs have been used.****
>>>>
>>>> ****
>>>>
>>>> Here is what I'm a bit fuzzy on:  It asks for all kinds of information
>>>> when trying to activate the UCSS PAK(s).  We're installing on VMWare but
>>>> we're going directly to 8.6.  I guess my question is:****
>>>>
>>>> ****
>>>>
>>>> Do I need to enter anything in the two boxes related to system setup?**
>>>> **
>>>>
>>>> ****
>>>>
>>>> Description of purchased software tied to the software subscription.***
>>>> *
>>>>
>>>> Description of purchased software tied to the software subscription.***
>>>> *
>>>>
>>>> "IF CCM 5.0, Unity, Unity Connection, MeetingPlace or MeetingPlace
>>>> Express, enter the MAC address of the software system tied to this
>>>> subscription"****
>>>>
>>>> ****
>>>>
>>>> "If any other Voice product, describe your system configuration, date
>>>> initially purchased and any other identifying information that you have
>>>> available"****
>>>>
>>>> ****
>>>>
>>>> I understand that once this is activated, I can request the 8.6 kit
>>>> from PUT.****
>>>>
>>>> *This message w/attachments (message) is intended solely for the use
>>>> of the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged,
>>>> confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please
>>>> notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy all copies and
>>>> attachments.  Please be advised that any review or dissemination of, or the
>>>> taking of any action in reliance on, the information contained in or
>>>> attached to this message is prohibited.*****
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120509/7e7ce7d6/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list