[cisco-voip] Unity Connection 8.6 Exchange in seperate trusted Domain

[Ted Nugent]

Awesome, thanks guys!

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Chris Ward (chrward) <chrward at cisco.com>wrote:

>  James is correct. This is certainly possible.****
>
> ** **
>
> +Chris****
>
> Unity Connection TME****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Buchanan, James
> *Sent:* Monday, October 08, 2012 3:08 PM
> *To:* Ted Nugent; Cisco VoIPoE List
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection 8.6 Exchange in seperate
> trusted Domain****
>
> ** **
>
> I think it is possible. The authentication of users in Unity Connection
> for Single Inbox is not tied to the LDAP integration per se. The permission
> to send and receive voicemails comes from the account created on the
> Exchange server that gives Unity Connection the ability to impersonate
> users for sending and receiving voicemails. ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Ted Nugent
> *Sent:* Monday, October 08, 2012 6:57 PM
> *To:* Cisco VoIPoE List
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Unity Connection 8.6 Exchange in seperate trusted
> Domain****
>
> ** **
>
> A customer asked me the other day if it's possible to have single inbox
> enabled if thier Exchange 2010 servers reside in a separate trusted domain
> from where thier users reside and authenticate. I've been looking through
> the design guide and can't seem to determine if that's something that is
> feasible and/or supported and if there are caveats associated with that?
> Anyone ever run across this before?****
>
> Thanks****
>
> Ted****
>
> *
> James Buchanan | Sr. Network Engineer
> Presidio | www.presidio.com
> 12 Cadillac Drive Suite 130, Brentwood, TN 37027
> D: 615.866.5729 | C: 931.797.2326 | F: 615.866.5781 |
> jbuchanan at presidio.com*****
>
> *
>
> [image: Be Secure In The Knowledge] <http://www.presidio.com>*****
>
> *
> Follow us:
>
> [image: Follow Presidio on Twitter] <http://www.twitter.com/presidio>*****
>
> *This message w/attachments (message) is intended solely for the use of
> the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please
> notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy all copies and
> attachments. Please be advised that any review or dissemination of, or
> the taking of any action in reliance on, the information contained in or
> attached to this message is prohibited.*****
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20121008/8893aee7/attachment.html>