[cisco-voip] VG202 vs ATA187

[Scott Voll]

I think you will find that support will end up going longer on the VG202
than the ATA's.  And I believe (have not purchased one) that the VG's run
IOS, where as the ATA don't.

YMMV
Scott


On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Angel Castaneda
<hello at angelcastaneda.com>wrote:

> Good morning all,
>
> We're looking at moving our fax machines to CUCM 9.1, but we do not have
> the need for a VG224, as it's only a few devices.
>
> Other than the extra Ethernet port on a VG202, is there another reason I
> should be choosing that over an ATA187? Price-wise, the ATA187 is more
> attractive to us.
>
> Thank you in advance,
>
> *Angel Castaneda*
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130419/26312a28/attachment.html>